Saran v. Peters
| Khushpal K. Saran |
| Joseph A. Peters, Donlen Corp., John Doe I-X, ABC Corp. I-X and XYZ Employer I-X |
| 1:2016cv06013 |
| July 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Orange |
| Nelson Stephen Roman |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER: The Court has been informed that the Parties have reached a settlement in principle in this case. Accordingly, it hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed without costs and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court's calendar, provided the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days of this Order. Any application to reopen filed after thirty (30) days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis. Any pending motions are DISMISSED as moot, and all conferences are CANCELED. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 10/26/2020) (ks)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER: During a conference held on today's date, the Court mistakenly set a briefing schedule for Defendant's anticipated motion for summary judgment. The Court hereby withdraws the motion schedule and directs the parties to comply with th e Individual Rules of the Honorable Philip M. Halpern, the District Judge to whom this case is assigned, regarding motion practice, as soon as discovery is complete. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 8/14/2020) (kv)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER: This matter has recently been reassigned to me. Due to a further conference scheduled before Magistrate Judge Smith and to allow the parties to continue engaging in discovery, the case management conference previously scheduled for April 24, 2020 is hereby cancelled. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 4/13/2020) (ks)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER. In order to facilitate the progress of pre-trial discovery of this litigation in a just, speedy and inexpensive manner, to insure compliance with the case management plan, and to prevent the accumulation of unresolved discovery issues, the fol lowing procedures will be followed for the resolution of discovery disputes: The party objecting to disclosure, claiming an insufficient response to a discovery request, or asserting a privilege bears the burden of coming forward by bringing the dispute to the attention of the court as hereinafter set forth, and as further specified in this Order. So ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 11/18/2019) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
3
OPINION & ORDER re: 2 FIRST MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve Defendants. filed by Khushpal K. Saran. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to serve Defendants is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall prop erly effectuate service on or before July 1, 2019. Plaintiff is also directed to address the filing errors noted on the docket. The Court respectfully directs the Clerk of the Court to terminate the motion at ECF No. 2. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 5/13/2019) (rj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
