Pulte Homes of New York, LLC v. Town of Carmel et al
Pulte Homes of New York, LLC |
Town of Carmel and Town of Carmel Planning Board |
7:2016cv08093 |
October 17, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
White Plains Office |
XX Out of State |
Vincent L. Briccetti |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 36 MOTION for Reargument, filed by Town of Carmel, Town of Carmel Planning Board, 35 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability, filed by Pulte Homes of New York, LLC. Defendants' motion for reargument is GRANTED, and the amended complaint is DISMISSED. Plaintiff's motion to certify an appeal of the Court's September 5, 2017, Opinion and Order is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motions (Docs. ##35, 36) and close this case, and as further set forth in this order. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 10/27/2017) (ap) |
Filing 33 OPINION AND ORDER re: 20 MOTION to Dismiss amended Complaint. filed by Town of Carmel, Town of Carmel Planning Board. Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED with respect to Pulte's claims related to the 2008 Resolution s and DENIED with respect to Pulte's claims related to the 2013 Resolutions. The Court will schedule an initial conference by separate order. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion. (Doc. #20). So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 9/5/17) (yv) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.