Anderson v. Osborne et al
| Jerome Anderson |
| Osborne, Carter, Sergeant P. (John Doe#1), James Hennig, M. Ernst, Morell, Freeman, Dillon, Suedeker, Correction Officer (John Doe #2-Spanish), Correction Officer (Jane Doe#1-Spanish), S. Ganet, Registered Nurse Jane Doe#2, Bentivegna, Berstell and Eric Gutwein |
| 7:2017cv00539 |
| January 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Washington |
| Vincent L. Briccetti |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
178
ORDER : On October 20, 2020, the Court entered an Amended Judgment in the above-captioned action, which resolved all claims in this case. (Doc.#162). In addition, the Court has resolved the post-Judgment motion for attorney's fees. Accordingly, the Clerk is instructed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 6/30/2021) (vfr)
|
|
Filing
177
OPINION AND ORDER re: 163 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Jerome Anderson. The motion for attorneys fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b) is DENIED. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion. (Doc. #163). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 6/7/2021) (mml)
|
|
Filing
175
ORDER: Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED: By June 1, 2021, plaintiff's counsel shall communicate with their client regarding the matters discussed during today's conference and submit a letter to the Court regarding plaintiff's pending motion for attorney's fees. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 5/3/2021) (mml)
|
|
Filing
162
AMENDED JUDGMENT: It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: That on August 13, 2018, the Court dismissed with prejudice plaintiff Jerome Anderson's claims against defendants Sergeant Gordon Perry, Registered Nurse Ching Wang, Registered Nu rse S. Ganet, Doctor Bentivegna, Hearing Officer Eric Gutwein, and Pre-Hearing Assistant Randall Berstell; That on December 23, 2019, the Court dismissed with prejudice plaintiff Jerome Anderson's claims against defendants Correction Officers Lu is Cabrera and Christina Lorenzo; That plaintiff Jerome Anderson's claims against defendant Sergeant John Carter are dismissed, as a suggestion of death as to Sergeant Carter was filed on May 22, 2019, and plaintiff did not move to substitute Sergeant Carter's estate as a defendant in this action; That after a Jury Trial before the Honorable Vincent L. Briccetti, United States District Judge, plaintiff Jerome Anderson have judgment for compensatory damages against defendants Serg eant Robert Osborne and Correction Officers Matthew Ernst, James Hennig, and Robert Snedeker, in the amount of $75,000.00; plaintiff have judgment for punitive damages against Sergeant Robert Osborne in the amount of $275,000.00; plaintif f have judgment for punitive damages against Correction Officer Matthew Ernst in the amount of $125,000.00; plaintiff have judgment for punitive damages against Correction Officer James Hennig in the amount of $125,000.00; and plaintiff have judgment for punitive damages against Correction Officer Robert Snedeker in the amount of $50,000.00; That on February 12, 2020, during the aforesaid Jury Trial, plaintiff Jerome Anderson dismissed with prejudice his claims against defen dant Correction Officer Christopher Dillon; and That plaintiff Jerome Anderson's claims against Correction Officers Jose Morel and Warren Freeman are dismissed, because following the aforesaid Jury Trial, the jury found in favor of Correction Officers Morel and Freeman as to plaintiffs claims against them. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 10/20/2020) (ks)
|
|
Filing
133
JUDGMENT: It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: That after a Jury Trial before the Honorable Vincent L. Briccetti, United States District Judge, Plaintiff Jerome Anderson have judgment for compensatory damages against defendants Sgt. Robert Osborne, C.O. Matthew Ernst, C.O. James Hennig, and C.O. Robert Snedeker in the amount of $75,000.00; Plaintiff have judgment for punitive damages against Sgt. Robert Osborne in the amount of $275,000.00; Plaintiff have judgment for punitiv e damages against C.O. Matthew Ernst in the amount of$125,000.00; Plaintiff have judgment for punitive damages against C.O. James Hennig in the amount of $125,000.00; and Plaintiff have judgment for punitive damages against C.O. Robert Snedeker in the amount of $50,000.00. SO ORDERED. Party Osborne, Suedeker, M. Ernst and James Hennig terminated. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 2/21/2020) (mml)
|
|
Filing
131
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 128 Motion in Limine. The Court held an on-the-record conference today at which plaintiff's counsel and defense counsel appeared in person. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendants' mot ion in limine is GRANTED IN PART inasmuch as it seeks to preclude plaintiff from raising a Fourth Amendment claim at trial. 2. Defendants' motion in limine is DENIED AS MOOT inasmuch as it seeks to preclude plaintiff's use at trial of docum ents respecting his disciplinary appeal, Article 78 proceeding, and grievance submissions. The parties resolved at the conference this portion of defendants' motion. 3. Defendants' motion in limine is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE inasmuch as it seeks to preclude plaintiff from presenting certain exhibits or documents at trial. Plaintiff's counsel has agreed to provide defense counsel a detailed list containing all exhibits plaintiff intends to present at trial. 4. The clerk is instructed to terminate the motion. (Doc. #128). 5. Jury selection and trial is scheduled for February 10, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 2/5/2020) (mml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
