Valentine v. Brain & Spine Surgeons of New York, P.C. et al
| Julene Valentine |
| Brain & Spine Surgeons of New York, P.C., Scoliosis and Spine Surgery, P.C., Krishna Sharma and Rudolph Taddonio |
| 7:2017cv02275 |
| March 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Nelson Stephen Roman |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
OPINION & ORDER re: 16 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. filed by Krishna Sharma, Rudolph Taddonio, Brain & Spine Surgeons of New York, P.C., Scoliosis and Spine Surgery, P.C.. For the foregoing reason s, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in part, and partially converted to a Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties are ordered to contact Magistrate Judge Davison within three days of this Opinion to arrange a schedule for conducting di scovery on the fifteen-employee question. At the conclusion of discovery, the moving party shall inform this Court that discovery has been completed and request a briefing schedule for the one-issue Motion for Summary Judgment. Finally, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the motion at Docket Number 16. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 4/16/2018) (rj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
