Singer v. American Express Centurion Bank
| Taryn Singer |
| American Express Centurion Bank |
| 7:2017cv02507 |
| April 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Vincent L. Briccetti |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
FINAL APPROVAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT: It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. The definitions and provisions of the Settlement Agreement (the "Settlement Agreement") are hereby incorporated as though fully set forth herein. Fo r purposes of this Order, capitalized terms shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Settlement Agreement. 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Settlement Agreement with respect to and over all parties to the Settlemen t Agreement, including all members of the Settlement Class. 3. The Court hereby approves the settlement and finds that the settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable and adequate to the Settlement Class Members, within the authority of the pa rties and the result of extensive arm's length negotiations, as further set forth. 9. The Court hereby awards to Class Counsel fees and costs of $100,000.00. 10. The Court hereby awards $7,500.00 to Plaintiff as an incentive fee in co mpensation for the time, effort and risk she undertook as a representative of the Settlement Class and in the settlement and release of any individual claims she may have as set forth in the Settlement Agreement. 11. American Express shall pay the aw ards to Class Counsel and the Class Representative, as well as amounts due to Settlement Class Members, as prescribed by the Settlement Agreement. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion (Doc. #82) an close this case. Motions terminated: 82 MOTION to Approve Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, Attorney Fees, and Representative Award filed by Taryn Singer. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 5/26/2020) (mml)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT AND CONDITIONALLY CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS granting 72 Motion to Certify Class; granting 72 Motion to Approve; granting 72 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Preliminary Approval of Proposed Settlement. The Settlement Agreement, including all exhibits thereto, is preliminarily approved as fair, reasonable and adequate and within the range of possible approval. The Court finds that: (a) the Settlement Agreement resulted from extensive arm's length negotiations; and (b) the Settlement Agreement is sufficient to warrant notice thereof to Settlement Class Members and a full hearing on the approval of the Settlement. 2. Class Cert ification for Settlement Purposes. The Court conditionally certifies, for settlement purposes only, the following Settlement Class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b)(3), as further set forth. 3. Class Counsel. The Court appoints Bro mberg Law Office, P.C., and the Law Office of Harley J. Schnall, as counsel for the Settlement Class. The Court finds that these counsel are competent and capable of exercising their responsibilities as Class Counsel. 4. Settlement Hearing. A final approval hearing (the "Settlement Hearing") shall be held before the Honorable Vincent L. Briccetti, Courtroom 620, The Hon. Charles L. Brieant Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, New York 10601, on 4/24/2020 at 11:00 am as set forth in the notice to the Settlement Class. 11. Stay of Proceedings. All proceedings in the action are stayed until further order of the Court, except as may be necessary to implement the terms of the settl ement. Pending final determination of whether the settlement should be approved, neither the Class Representative nor any Settlement Class Member, either directly or in any representative or other capacity, shall commence or prosecute against any of the Released Parties any action or proceeding in any court or tribunal asserting any of the Released Claims. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 11/20/2019) (mml)
|
|
Filing
44
OPINION AND ORDER re: 32 MOTION to Dismiss filed by American Express Centurion Bank. The partial motion to dismiss is GRANTED. American Express shall file its answer to the second amended complaint by May 22, 2018. The Court will schedule an initial conference by separate order. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion. (Doc. #32). (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 5/8/2018) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Singer v. American Express Centurion Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Taryn Singer | |
| Represented By: | Brian Lewis Bromberg |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Robert Miller |
| Represented By: | Harley Jay Schnall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: American Express Centurion Bank | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
