Melendez v. The New York Foundling, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Melendez v. The New York Foundling, Inc.

Melendez v. The New York Foundling, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Lorenzo Melendez
Defendant:	The New York Foundling, Inc.
Case Number:	7:2017cv06162
Filed:	August 15, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	White Plains Office
Presiding Judge:	Kenneth M. Karas
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 451
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 11, 2021	Filing 47 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reop en the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same thirty day period to be "so ordere d" by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(B) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are denied. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/11/2021) (jca)
March 7, 2019	Filing 36 OPINION & ORDER re: 30 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint. filed by The New York Foundling, Inc. Defendant's Motion To Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's ERISA claim is dismissed without preju dice. If Plaintiff wishes to file a second amended complaint, Plaintiff must do so within 30 days of the date of this Opinion. Any newly filed complaint will replace, not supplement, the instant Amended Complaint, and must contain all of the claim s, exhibits, and factual allegations Plaintiff wishes the Court to consider, as well as all changes to correct the deficiencies identified in this Opinion. If Plaintiff fails to abide by the 30-day deadline, his claims may be dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is respectfully directed to terminate the pending Motion. (Dkt. No. 30.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/6/19) (yv)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 11, 2021

Filing 47 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reop en the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same thirty day period to be "so ordere d" by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(B) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are denied. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/11/2021) (jca)

March 7, 2019

Filing 36 OPINION & ORDER re: 30 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint. filed by The New York Foundling, Inc. Defendant's Motion To Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's ERISA claim is dismissed without preju dice. If Plaintiff wishes to file a second amended complaint, Plaintiff must do so within 30 days of the date of this Opinion. Any newly filed complaint will replace, not supplement, the instant Amended Complaint, and must contain all of the claim s, exhibits, and factual allegations Plaintiff wishes the Court to consider, as well as all changes to correct the deficiencies identified in this Opinion. If Plaintiff fails to abide by the 30-day deadline, his claims may be dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is respectfully directed to terminate the pending Motion. (Dkt. No. 30.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/6/19) (yv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Melendez v. The New York Foundling, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lorenzo Melendez
Represented By:	Michael Bruce Ranis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: The New York Foundling, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?