White Plains Housing Authority v. BP Products North America Inc.
White Plains Housing Authority |
BP Products North America Inc. |
7:2017cv06250 |
August 17, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
White Plains Office |
Nelson Stephen Roman |
Environmental Matters |
42 U.S.C. ยง 6901 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 240 RESCHEDULING ORDER terminating 239 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. TO ALL PARTIES: The Settlement Conference previously scheduled for March 23, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy has been rescheduled for April 10, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. Parties are required to appear. Counsel are required to submit a confidential, ex parte letter, so identified, to the Court, not to exceed 5 pages in length, no later than five business days prior to the conference, outlining any information counsel believes would assist the Court in preparation for the conference. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy on 3/15/2023) (vfr) |
Filing 230 OPINION & ORDER re: 193 MOTION to Dismiss or in the alternative. MOTION to Stay Notice by Defendant Marianina Oil Corp.. filed by White Plains Housing Authority, 197 CROSS MOTION to Dismiss or in the alternative, Motion to Stay. filed by Marianina Oil Corp. For the foregoing reasons, the Court RESERVES JUDGMENT on Plaintiff's motion to preclude and DENIES Defendant's motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, stay the action. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF Nos. 193, 197. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 12/19/22) (yv) |
Filing 223 ORDER & OPINION : After a review of the materials, it is hereby ORDERED that the stay of the sale is lifted on the condition that White Plains Hospital is prepared to step into the shoes of Marianina in all aspects of this matter, meaning tha t White Plains Hospital will assume any and all existing liabilities, defenses, as well as the right to appeal just as Marianina would, the procedural posture of this case will not change, and Plaintiff retains the same rights, claims, and d efenses against White Plains Hospital it otherwise would possess as against Marianina; ORDERED that should Marianina complete the sale of the Service Station to White Plains Hospital in accordance with this order as outlined above, White Plains Hospital shall be substituted as the named defendant. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 7/25/2022) (ate) |
Filing 206 RESCHEDULING ORDER: Due to a Court scheduling conflict, the in-person Show Cause Hearing scheduled for May 4, 2022 at 11:00 am is hereby rescheduled with the parties' consent to May 6, 2022 at 11:00 am. ( Show Cause Hearing set for 5/6/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge Nelson Stephen Roman.) (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 5/2/2022) (ate) |
Filing 112 OPINION & ORDER re: 103 MOTION for Summary Judgment: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED on the issue of liability. The case shall proceed to discovery on the determination of damages and available injunctive relief. The Court will issue an order of referral to Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy for further discovery on the issue of damages and injunctive relief, and the parties are directed to contact Magistrate Judge McCarty within three days of that order to schedule such proceedings. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 103. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 8/27/2020) (jwh) |
Filing 110 MEMO ENDORSEMENT denying 104 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 105 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 106 Motion for Summary Judgment. ENDORSEMENT: On November 22, 2019 at a Pre-Motion Conference, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to f ile a motion for summary judgment and set the briefing schedule. On January 21, 2020, at the request of Plaintiff, the Court revised the briefing schedule directing all motion-related documents shall be filed on January 29, 2020. Plaintiff filed its motion documents on January 29, 2020, however, each document was filed as a motion. Only the Notice of Motion should be filed as a motion. All supporting documents are not separate motions. Therefore, the motions filed at ECF Nos. 104, 105 and 10 6 are denied as they are not stand alone motions but supporting documents to one motion (ECF No. 103). Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motions (ECF Nos. 104, 105 and 106). (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 2/10/2020) (cf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: White Plains Housing Authority v. BP Products North America Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: White Plains Housing Authority | |
Represented By: | Norman W. Bernstein |
Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Desmond |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BP Products North America Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.