Accosta et al v. Lorelei Events Group, Inc. et al
| Frank Accosta and David Rosenstock |
| Lorelei Events Group, Inc. and Lorraine Totaro |
| 7:2017cv07804 |
| October 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Nelson Stephen Roman |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
JUDGMENT AGAINST LORELEI EVENTS GROUP AND LORRAINE TOTARO, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, IN THE AMOUNT OF $110,957.91: NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants agree the Court shall ORDER, ADJUDGE AND DECREE: that Defendants Lorelei Events Group, Inc., and Lorraine Totaro, jointly and severally, shall pay Plaintiffs $110,957.91 as follows: (a) $22,737.48 in unpaid salary and benefits to Accosta; (b) $16,925.46 in unpaid salary to Rosenstock; (c) 71,294.97 in liquidated damages to Accosta stemming from Defendants' failure to timely pay his salary on the Defendants' established pay dates. SO ORDERED THIS 22 day Of March 2022, that Plaintiffs Frank Accosta and David Rosenstock have judgment against Lorelei Events G roup, Inc., and Lorraine Totaro, Individually, in the amount of $110,957.91, plus any additional reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred by Plaintiffs in connection with this until judgment has been fully satisfied as this Court may award based upon a subsequent fee application filed by Plaintiffs. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 3/22/2022) (ate)
|
|
Filing
104
OPINION & ORDER re: 91 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by David Rosenstock, Frank Accosta. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Accosta is granted summa ry judgment for his FLSA and NYLL claims for unpaid and untimely wages, and Rosenstock is granted summary judgment for his FLSA and NYLL claims for unpaid wages. Plaintiffs are also granted summary judgment for their unjust enrichment claims again st Lorelei for unpaid wages, and for their ERISA claims against Lorelei. The remaining claims include Rosenstock's FLSA claim for untimely wages, Plaintiffs' claims against Totaro for unjust enrichment and unpaid benefits under ERISA, an d Plaintiffs' claims against both Defendants for failure to provide wage statements and change in compensation notices under the NYLL, and unjust enrichment related to their classification as independent contractors. The parties are directed to appear for a telephonic pre-trial conference on February 24, 2022 at 2:00 PM. To access the telephonic pre-trial conference, please follow these instructions: (1) Dial the meeting number: (877) 336-1839; (2) enter the Access Code: 1231334#; ( 3) press pound (#) to enter the conference as a guest. The Court respectfully directs the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion at ECF No. 91. ( Telephone Conference set for 2/24/2022 at 02:00 PM before Judge Nelson Stephen Roman.) (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 1/21/2022) (ate)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER: Beginning March 30, 2020, until further notice, all parties to civil conferences before Judge Davison shall attend by phone, using the following information: Toll-Free Number: (877) 336-1839 Access Code: 5999739 The parties should call in f rom a landline and announce their names before speaking. For Settlement Conferences: Clients should NOT be on the conference call. Counsel must have ready telephonic access to clients. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison on 5/6/2020) (ks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
