DiPippo v. County Of Putnam et al
Plaintiff: Anthony DiPippo
Defendant: County Of Putnam, Robert Thoubboron, Dan Stephens, Patrick Castaldo, Bill Quick and Victor Nestor
Case Number: 7:2017cv07948
Filed: October 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: White Plains Office
Presiding Judge: Nelson Stephen Roman
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER granting 90 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Due to the extension of the discovery cutoff date, Defendants' request to adjourn the Status Conf. from Sept. 16, 2020 until Dec. 18, 2020 at 10:30 am is granted. Clerk of the Court requested to terminate the motion (doc. 90). Status Conference set for 12/18/2020 at 10:30 AM before Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 8/3/2020) (rj)
June 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER granting 88 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Status Conf. is adjourned from July 24, 2020 until Sept. 16, 2020 at 11:30 am. Clerk of the Court requested to terminate the motion (doc. 88). SO ORDERED. Status Conference set for 9/16/2020 at 11:30 AM before Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 6/2/2020) (rj)
April 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER granting 85 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Due to an extension of the discovery deadlines, the Status Conf. scheduled for April 24, 2020 is adjourned until July 24, 2020 at 11:30 am. Clerk of the Court requested to terminate the motion (doc. 85). SO ORDERED., Status Conference set for 7/24/2020 at 11:30 AM before Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 4/21/2020) (rj)
January 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER FOR LEAVE TO DEPOSE A PERSON IN PRISON granting 73 Letter Motion for Discovery. The Court, after reviewing the application by Plaintiff Anthony DiPippo, consented to by all parties, and considering the grounds therefore, does hereby order: 1. Pursuant to Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Anthony DiPippo has this Court's leave to take the deposition testimony of Howard Gombert, a person incarcerated at the Cheshire Correctional Institution, located at 900 H ighland Avenue, Cheshire, CT 06410; 2. The deposition of Howard Gombert will be taken on January 31, 2020; and 3. The deposition of Howard Gombert shall be recorded stenographically and video graphically. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy on 1/22/2020) (kv)
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER granting 69 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Due to an extension of the discovery deadline, the conference is adjourned from January 10, 2020 to a date after April 10, 2020 to be determined by the Court. Clerk of the Court requested to terminate the motion (doc. 69). (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 1/2/2020) (va)
December 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER granting 66 Letter Motion for Local Rule 37.2 Conference. Accordingly, by December 10, 2019, OCDA is ordered to produce the documents bearing Bates Stamp Nos. OCDA 84-191. OCDA shall designate all documents as confidential pursuant to the p arties' Confidentiality Stipulation and Order, and shall further designate Defreitas' medical records and photographs, (Bates Stamp Nos. OCDA 84-176), as attorneys' eyes only. Finally, OCDA shall redact any personal identifying informa tion from the documents, and shall redact the first six digits for all phone numbers contained in the cellphone usage records (Bates Stamp Nos. OCDA 177-191). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy on 12/6/2019) (kv) Modified on 12/6/2019 (kv).
February 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 50 OPINION AND ORDER re: 28 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) filed by Victor Nestor, County Of Putnam, Robert Thoubboron. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' Motion is GRANTED in part and DENI ED in part. Defendants' Motion is DENIED insofar as: Plaintiff's fabrication claim against Nestor, Plaintiff's various theories of Monell liability against Putnam, and Plaintiff's Supervisory Liability claims against Sheriff Thoubon-on. Defendants' Motion is GRANTED, with prejudice, insofar as the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim against Putnam and failure to investigate claims predicated on the due process clause. It is GRANTED without prejud ice insofar as Plaintiff's failure to intervene claims. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 28. The parties are directed to inform Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy of the Court's decision. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 2/28/2019) (mro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DiPippo v. County Of Putnam et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony DiPippo
Represented By: Nick Joel Brustin
Represented By: Emma Kate Freudenberger
Represented By: Richard W Sawyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County Of Putnam
Represented By: James A. Randazzo
Represented By: Drew William Sumner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Thoubboron
Represented By: James A. Randazzo
Represented By: Drew William Sumner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dan Stephens
Represented By: James A. Randazzo
Represented By: Drew William Sumner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patrick Castaldo
Represented By: James A. Randazzo
Represented By: Drew William Sumner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bill Quick
Represented By: James A. Randazzo
Represented By: Drew William Sumner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Victor Nestor
Represented By: James A. Randazzo
Represented By: Drew William Sumner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?