In Re: Bradley C. Reifler
| Bradley C. Reifler |
| Bradley C. Reifler |
| North Carolina Mutual Life Insurance Company |
| 7:2018cv02559 |
| March 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Dutchess |
| Cathy Seibel |
| Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
OPINION AND ORDER re: 7 MOTION for Attorney Fees Appellee's Rule 8020 Motion For Reasonable Attorneys' Fees And Double Costs filed by North Carolina Mutual Life Insurance Company, 5 MOTION to Dismiss Appellee's Motion To Dismiss Appeal filed by North Carolina Mutual Life Insurance Company. For the reasons set forth above, Appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal from the February 2018 Order is GRANTED, and Appellee's motion for attorneys� 39; fees and costs is GRANTED to the extent that fees and costs, although not double costs, are awarded. Appellants appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Appellee is directed to submit to this Court a bill of attorneys' fees and costs associated w ith defending this appeal and moving for attorneys' fees and costs by July 30, 2018. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motions, (Docs. 5, 7), enter judgment for Appellee, and close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/28/2018) (mml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
