In Re: Richard LW Holt
Richard LW Holt |
Richard LW Holt |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
7:2018cv03073 |
April 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
White Plains Office |
Westchester |
Kenneth M. Karas |
Appeal |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 OPINION AND ORDER: The Bankruptcy Court did not abuse its discretion or, indeed, err under any standard of review in dismissing Appellants bankruptcy case and denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. See Wenegieme, 580 B.R. at 23 (&q uot;Based on the Court's de novo review of this evidence [of bad faith], the Court concludes that the Bankruptcy Court correctly dismissed the case pursuant to § 1307(c)."); see also In re Khan, 593 F. App'x 83, 86 (2d Cir . 2015) (holding that bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in finding bad faith where a party's "general pattern of groundless litigation in the bankruptcy courts [was] premised not on actual disputes with the actions of t rustees but rather on frivolous, obstructive objections to the bankruptcy system"). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case and to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff, and as further set forth in this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 2/5/2019) (jca) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.