Singh v. Knuckles, Komosinski & Manfro, LLP et al
| Mandip K. Singh |
| Knuckles, Komosinski & Manfro, LLP and Debbie Bhoorasingh |
| 7:2018cv03213 |
| April 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Westchester |
| Vincent L. Briccetti |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within forty-five (45) days of the date hereof. In light of a settlement having been reached, the jury selection and trial date of January 30, 2023, is hereby cancelled. The parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain j urisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next 45 days with a request that the agreement be "so ordered" by the Court. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 1/26/2023) (ate)
|
|
Filing
64
OPINION & ORDER re: 55 MOTION in Limine . filed by Debbie Bhoorasingh, Knuckles, Komosinski & Manfro, LLP. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion in limine is DENIED. In summary, the Court denies as premature Defend ants' request to preclude (1) Plaintiff's testimony regarding her job performance; (2) Plaintiff's testimony regarding "anxiety" and "irritable bowel syndrome"; and (3) Plaintiff's testimony regarding her medical treatment during her pregnancy. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 55. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 3/22/2022) (ate)
|
|
Filing
49
RESCHEDULING ORDER: In light of the recent Coronavirus Disease 2019 ("COVID-19") pandemicaffecting New York, and given the directives provided by the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to limit in-person court appearances due to the risk presented by COVID-19, and due to a Court scheduling conflict, the above case previously scheduled for a Pretrial Conference on January 13, 2021 is hereby adjourned on the same date from 10:00 am unt il 3:00 pm via AT&T teleconference. To access the teleconference, please follow these directions: (1) Dial the Meeting Number: (877) 336-1839; (2) Enter the Access Code: 1231334 #; (3) Press pound (#) to enter the teleconference as a guest. (Telephone Conference set for 1/13/2021 at 03:00 PM before Judge Nelson Stephen Roman.) (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 1/11/2021) (rro)
|
|
Filing
48
OPINION & ORDER re: 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Debbie Bhoorasingh, Knuckles, Komosinski & Manfro, LLP. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to termin ate the motion at ECF No. 36. A pretrial conference is scheduled for January 13, 2021 at 10:00 A.M. by teleconference. To access the teleconference, please follow these directions: (1) Dial the Meeting Number: (877) 336-1839; (2) Enter the Access Code: 1231334 #; (3) Press pound (#) to enter the teleconference as a guest. SO ORDERED., ( Telephone Conference set for 1/13/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Nelson Stephen Roman.) (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 11/16/20) (yv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
