Dish Network L.L.C. v. Siddiqi

Dish Network L.L.C. v. Siddiqi

Plaintiff:	Dish Network L.L.C.
Defendant:	Imtiyaz Siddiqi
Case Number:	7:2018cv04397
Filed:	May 17, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	White Plains Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Vincent L. Briccetti
Nature of Suit:	Trademark
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1114
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 4, 2019	Filing 61 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the Court's November 6, 2019 Order and Opinion (Doc. #57) granting Plaintiff DISH Network L.L.C.'s motion for partial summary judgment against Defendant Imtiyaz Siddiqi, the Court enters the following judgmen t against Defendant: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff on Count III and Count IV of the amended complaint for Defendant's contributory and vicarious trademark infringement. 2. Plaintiff is awarded $300,000 in damages against Defendant. 3. The remaining Counts of the amended complaint are dismissed without prejudice. 4. Plaintiff elected to forgo recovery of its reasonable attorney's fees and costs. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs incurred in this case. 5. Defendant is permanently enjoined from selling, offering for sale, or accepting payment for any product or service infringing on any of Plaintiff's DISH marks. 6. This Court retains jurisdiction over any matter pertaining to this judgment. 7. This case is closed and the Clerk shall remove it from the Court's docket. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 12/4/2019) (mro)
November 6, 2019	Filing 57 OPINION AND ORDER re: 37 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Dish Network L.L.C. The motion for partial summary judgment and for an award of costs and attorneys' fees is GRANTED. Defendant is permanently enjoined from selling, offering for sale, or accepting payment for any product or service infringing on any of plaintiff's DISH marks. By November 20, 2019, plaintiff shall submit documentation of its costs and attorneys' fees incurred in this case, and a conc ise explanation of why the requested fees are reasonable. By December 4, 2019, defendant may file an opposition to plaintiff's fee application. Also by November 20, 2019, plaintiff's counsel shall advise the Court by letter how plaintiff wishes to proceed, if at all, on its remaining claims (Counts I, II, V, VI, and VII of the amended complaint). The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion. (Doc. #37). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 11/6/2019) (mml)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 4, 2019

Filing 61 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the Court's November 6, 2019 Order and Opinion (Doc. #57) granting Plaintiff DISH Network L.L.C.'s motion for partial summary judgment against Defendant Imtiyaz Siddiqi, the Court enters the following judgmen t against Defendant: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff on Count III and Count IV of the amended complaint for Defendant's contributory and vicarious trademark infringement. 2. Plaintiff is awarded $300,000 in damages against Defendant. 3. The remaining Counts of the amended complaint are dismissed without prejudice. 4. Plaintiff elected to forgo recovery of its reasonable attorney's fees and costs. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs incurred in this case. 5. Defendant is permanently enjoined from selling, offering for sale, or accepting payment for any product or service infringing on any of Plaintiff's DISH marks. 6. This Court retains jurisdiction over any matter pertaining to this judgment. 7. This case is closed and the Clerk shall remove it from the Court's docket. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 12/4/2019) (mro)

November 6, 2019

Filing 57 OPINION AND ORDER re: 37 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Dish Network L.L.C. The motion for partial summary judgment and for an award of costs and attorneys' fees is GRANTED. Defendant is permanently enjoined from selling, offering for sale, or accepting payment for any product or service infringing on any of plaintiff's DISH marks. By November 20, 2019, plaintiff shall submit documentation of its costs and attorneys' fees incurred in this case, and a conc ise explanation of why the requested fees are reasonable. By December 4, 2019, defendant may file an opposition to plaintiff's fee application. Also by November 20, 2019, plaintiff's counsel shall advise the Court by letter how plaintiff wishes to proceed, if at all, on its remaining claims (Counts I, II, V, VI, and VII of the amended complaint). The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion. (Doc. #37). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 11/6/2019) (mml)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dish Network L.L.C. v. Siddiqi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dish Network L.L.C.
Represented By:	Timothy Frank
Represented By:	Robert Richard Jones
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Imtiyaz Siddiqi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?