Wong v. Blind Brook-Rye Union Free School District et al
| Tracey Wong |
| Blind Brook-Rye Union Free School District, Johnathan Ross and Patricia Lambert |
| 7:2018cv05692 |
| June 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Westchester |
| Nelson Stephen Roman |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Plaintiff Tracey Wong ("Plaintiff") filed the present action on June 22, 2018, asserting claims sounding in, inter alia, employment discrimination. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on October 22, 201 8. (ECF No. 3.) On March 2, 2020, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before April 3, 2020, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4l(b). (ECF No. 4.) By letter dated April 1, 2020, Plaintiff responded to the Court's Order to Show Cause. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff seeks to withdraw the Amended Complaint without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (Id.) In light of the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED that the Amended Complaint is permitted to be withdrawn and the action is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 4/4/2020) (jca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
