D.P. v. JUUL Labs, Inc et al
| D.P. an infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, L.P. and D.P. |
| PAX Labs, Inc. and JUUL Labs, Inc |
| 7:2018cv05758 |
| June 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Rockland |
| Cathy Seibel |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #17 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: JUUL Labs, Inc may have until 9/18/18 to respond to the complaint. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Declan Thomas Conroy on behalf of JUUL Labs, Inc. (Conroy, Declan) |
| Filing 17 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Jason P.W. Halperin dated August 14, 2018. Document filed by JUUL Labs, Inc.(Halperin, Jason) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jason P.W. Halperin on behalf of JUUL Labs, Inc. (Halperin, Jason) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PAX LABS, INC. WITHOUT PREJUDICE: 1. Plaintiff's claims against PAX Labs are hereby dismissed without prejudice, contingent on the following conditions: 2. PAX Labs will maintain its litigation hold throughout the pendency of the litigation against defendant JUUL Labs, Inc.; 3. PAX Labs will produce witnesses for deposition in this litigation against defendant JUUL Labs, Inc by notice only, without requiring a subpoena; 4. The statute of limitations for Plaintiff's claims against PAX Labs will be tolled throughout the pendency of this litigation against defendant JUUL Labs, Inc.; 5. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees. 6. This dismissal without prejudice shall not affect Plaintiffs claims against any other party. IT IS SO STIPULATED. PAX Labs, Inc. terminated., Motions terminated: #14 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time or for dismissal of PAX without prejudice addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Jason L. Solotaroff dated July 23,2018. filed by D.P.. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/30/2018) (mml) |
| Filing 14 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time or for dismissal of PAX without prejudice addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Jason L. Solotaroff dated July 23,2018. Document filed by D.P.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Solotaroff, Jason) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. JUUL Labs, Inc waiver sent on 7/3/2018, answer due 9/4/2018. Document filed by D.P.. (Solotaroff, Jason) |
|
Filing 12
MEMO ENDORSEMENT ON PROPOSED STIPULATION OD DISMISSAL OF PAX LABS, INC. WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ENDORSEMENT: Application Denied without prejudice to renewal. See Local Rule 83.2 So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/16/2018) (rro)
|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. PAX Labs, Inc. served on 7/2/2018, answer due 7/23/2018. Service was accepted by Denai Neilander, Unknown Title. Document filed by D.P.. (Solotaroff, Jason) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. JUUL Labs, Inc served on 7/2/2018, answer due 7/23/2018. Service was accepted by Anne Frank, Unknown Title. Document filed by D.P.. (Solotaroff, Jason) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to JUUL Labs, Inc. (dnh) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to PAX Labs, Inc.. (dnh) |
| Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to JUUL Labs, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by D.P.. (Solotaroff, Jason) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to PAX Labs, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by D.P.. (Solotaroff, Jason) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION of Jason L. Solotaroff in Support re: #3 MOTION for Leave to File complaint pseudonymously .. Document filed by D.P.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Filed Complaint)(Solotaroff, Jason) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #3 MOTION for Leave to File complaint pseudonymously . . Document filed by D.P.. (Solotaroff, Jason) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to File complaint pseudonymously . Document filed by D.P..(Solotaroff, Jason) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Jason Louis Solotaroff. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: D.P.. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered incorrectly. (sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Cathy Seibel. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (sj) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Solotaroff, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JUUL Labs, Inc, PAX Labs, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 0208-15247665)Document filed by D.P. an infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, L.P..(Solotaroff, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
