Goldman v. Berryhill
Scot T Goldman and Scot T. Goldman |
Nancy A. Berryhill |
Social Security Administration |
7:2018cv06891 |
August 1, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
White Plains Office |
Orange |
Kenneth M Karas |
Judith C McCarthy |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint served. Document filed by Scot T. Goldman. Electronic Certified Administrative Record due by 11/28/2018. (Gogerty, Gary) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Benil Abraham on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill. (Abraham, Benil) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Nancy A. Berryhill. (pne) |
Filing 7 ENDORSEMENT on Declaration in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Application granted. So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy on 8/28/18) (yv) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER IN RE MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 16-MISC-171 Standing Order filed April 28, 2016). ORDERED that in all Social Security cases hereafter filed under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. 1383(c)(3), the defendant shall within 90 days after service file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings, which shall constitute the defendants' answer, or otherwise move against the complaint... that unless otherwise ordered by the judge to whom the case is assigned, in cases where the plaintiff is represented by counsel, the plaintiff shall file a motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the defendant files the certified transcript of the administrative proceedings... that in cases where the plaintiff is appearing pro se, the defendant shall file its motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the certified transcript of administrative proceedings have been filed... (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/20/2016) (pne) |
Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Social Security. Referred to Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 8/22/2018) (kgo) |
Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (bcu) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Kenneth M. Karas. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (bcu) |
CASE ACCEPTED AS SIMILAR. Create association to 7:13-cv-03291-KMK-JCM. Notice of Assignment to follow. (bcu) |
Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. (pne) |
CASE REFERRED TO Judge Kenneth M. Karas as possibly similar to 13CV3291. (pne) |
Filing 4 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Scot T Goldman.(Gogerty, Gary) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Scot T Goldman. (Gogerty, Gary) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Gogerty, Gary) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill. Document filed by Scot T Goldman.(Gogerty, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.