ABC v. DEF
7:2018cv08892 |
November 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
White Plains Office |
Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 184 ORDER granting 183 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Granted. The conference is adjourned to 4/11/2024 at 11:00 via teleconference. So Ordered. (Telephone Conference set for 4/11/2024 at 11:00 AM before Judge Kenneth M. Karas.) (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/11/24) (yv) |
Filing 182 OPINION AND ORDER re: 151 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Maranatha Human Services, Inc.. For the reasons stated above, Maranatha's Motion is denied. The Court will hold a telephonic status conference in this case on Apr il 2, 2024 at 10:30 a.m. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending Motion. (See Dkt. No. 151.) SO ORDERED. ( Telephone Conference set for 4/2/2024 at 10:30 AM before Judge Kenneth M. Karas.) (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/5/2024) (tg) |
Filing 177 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER on re: 176 Letter notifying court of formal settlement of action and mooting of Relator's motion for Attorney fees (Dkt. Nos. 100-102, filed by Maranatha Human Services, Inc. denying as moot 100 Motion for Attorne y Fees; denying as moot 101 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying as moot 102 Motion for Attorney Fees. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motions (Dkt. Nos. 100102), as the Parties' settlement moots the claims therein. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 7/21/23) (yv) |
Filing 170 ORDER granting 169 Letter Motion to Seal. Granted. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 5/26/23) (yv) |
Filing 160 ORDER granting 159 Letter Motion to Seal. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 5/22/2023) (ks) |
Filing 156 ORDER granting 154 Letter Motion to Seal. Granted. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/28/23) (yv) |
Filing 140 NOTICE OF TELECONFERENCE INFORMATION. For the week of February 20, 2023, the Court will hold all civil conferences, hearings, and/or oral arguments in the above-numbered Action by telephone. Counsel shall call the following number at the designated time: Meeting Dial-In Number (USA toll-free): (888) 363-4749 Access Code: 7702195. Please enter the conference as a guest by pressing the pound sign (#). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 2/17/23) (yv) |
Filing 113 NOTICE OF TELECONFERENCE INFORMATION: For the week of November 14, 2022, the Court will hold all civil conferences, hearings, and/or oral arguments in the above-numbered Action by telephone. Counsel shall call the following number at the designated t ime: Meeting Dial-In Number (USA toll-free): (888) 363-4749 Access Code: 7702195. Please enter the conference as a guest by pressing the pound sign (#). Given that much of the Court is operating remotely and has limited mail capability, counsel invol ved in any pro se cases shall mail a copy of this Notice to or otherwise inform the pro se party of the above teleconference information. Counsel in any pro se inmate cases shall ensure that the pro se party is on the line before calling the above-re ferenced number. For initial conferences, counsel shall submit a proposed case management and discovery schedule via ECF by 5 p.m. on the evening before the initial conference. Any requests for adjournments should be filed as soon as possible and clearly explain why the conference should be adjourned. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 11/14/2022) (ama) |
Filing 111 ORDER granting 110 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Granted. The conference is adjourned to 11/16/22 at 11:00. Telephone Conference set for 11/16/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge Kenneth M. Karas.. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 10/13/2022) (tro) |
Filing 106 ORDER deferring ruling on 100 Motion for Attorney Fees; deferring ruling on 101 Motion for Attorney Fees; deferring ruling on 102 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 105 Letter Motion to Stay re: 100 MOTION for Attorney Fees ., 101 MOTION for Attorney Fees ., 102 MOTION for Attorney Fees ., 105 FIRST LETTER MOTION to Stay re: 100 MOTION for Attorney Fees ., 101 MOTION for Attorney Fees ., 102 MOTION for Attorney Fees . Letter addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Tina Sciocchetti dated 9/. Granted. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 9/26/22) (yv) |
Filing 78 ORDER: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Court finds that the interests of justice significantly outweigh the need for confidentiality with respect to the patient-identifying information that OPWDD will be producing in response to the Relator's subpoena. 2. OPWDD is ordered to produce its response to Relator's subpoena without redactions, with the documents labeled as "CONDFIDENTIAL" pursuant to the Court's Protective Order filed on April 6, 20 22, and subject to the protections set forth in that order, a copy of which is attached to this order. 3. The parties are directed to comply scrupulously with the Court's Protective Order for all purposes in litigation of Relator' ;s case, including, but not limited to, with respect to any patient-identifying information that is produced in response to Relator's subpoena to OPWDD. 4. With respect to any filing in this case in which information including patient-identifying information is included, the parties can seek the Court's approval to seal the portion of the filing that contains the patient-identifying information. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause on 8/3/2022) (tg) |
Filing 54 ORDER: In order to facilitate the progress of pre-trial discovery of this litigation in a just, speedy and inexpensive manner, to ensure compliance with the case management plan, and to prevent the accumulation of unresolved discovery issues, the following procedures will be followed for the resolution of discovery disputes: The party objecting to disclosure, claiming an insufficient response to a discovery request, or asserting a privilege bears the burden of coming forward by bringing the dispute to the attention of the Court as hereinafter set forth. In calculating when a dispute arises, the Court anticipates that the parties have complied with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Civil Rules of the United States Di strict Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, in that the discovery demand or disclosure at issue and the adversary's response have been served and further set forth in this Order. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause on 5/31/2022) (rro) |
Filing 39 CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER..regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material...SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 4/6/2022) (jca) |
Filing 17 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The seal shall be lifted as to the States Notice of Election to Intervene; the Stipulation and Order of Settlement and Dismissal entered into by the State, Defendant Henry Alfonso Coley, and the Relator, and this Order. SO ORDERED: (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 11/9/21) (yv) Previously filed under seal and unsealed by docket entry #16. Modified on 11/17/2021 (yv). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ABC v. DEF | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.