Deem v. DiMella-Deem et al
Michael A. Deem |
Hon. Hal B. Greenwald, Lorna M. DiMella-Deem, Hon. Joseph A. Egitto and Esq. Linda Eichen |
7:2018cv11889 |
December 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Kenneth M Karas |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Mailed a copy of #8 Memo Endorsement, to Michael A. Deem 26 Keystone Road Yonkers, NY 10710. (vba) |
Filing 8 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #6 Letter, filed by Lorna M. DiMella-Deem. ENDORSEMENT: There is a schedule whereby a co-defendant is moving to Dismiss. Ms. Deem may join in that motion if she wants, which is due 2/22/19. In the meantime, Plaintiff is ordered to avoid any harassing behavior toward Ms. Deem. Failure to follow this order could result in sanctions, including contempt and dismissal of this case. SO ORDERED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to the Plaintiff. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 1/23/2019) (jca) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. |
Mailed a copy of #7 Order on Motion for Leave to File Document, to Michael A. Deem 26 Keystone Road Yonkers, NY 10710. (vba) |
Filing 7 ORDER re #5 Letter Motion for Leave File Pre-Answer Motion to Dismiss. Defense Motion to Dismiss is due 2/22/19. Plaintiff's response is due 3/22/19. Defense reply is due 4/12/19. SO ORDERED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to the Plaintiff. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 1/22/2019) (jca) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. |
Filing 6 LETTER from Lorna M. Deem dated January 22, 2019 re: I ask this court to please consider and ultimately recognize the irrational, unsubstantiated and over-reaching claims of the complaint and thereby dismiss this action minimizing further damages to all involved. Document filed by Lorna M. DiMella-Deem.(sbr) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 2/22/2019, Responses due by 3/22/2019, Replies due by 4/12/2019. (jca) |
Filing 5 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Pre-Answer Motion to DIsmiss addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Anthony P. Colavita dated January 10, 2019. Document filed by Linda Eichen.(Colavita, Anthony) |
Filing 4 LETTER addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas and Paul E. Davison from Michael A. Deem dated 12/19/2018 re: I am the Pro Se Plaintiff in the above entitled action. Please find enclosed a courtesy copy of the complaint in this matter which was filed yesterday. In light of a recent decision, I will voluntarily dismiss the claims against Judge Egitto when the other three defendants are served. Document filed by Michael A. Deem.(vn) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (pne) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lorna M. DiMella-Deem, Joseph A. Egitto, Linda Eichen, Hal B. Greenwald. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 465401224920)Document filed by Michael A. Deem.(pne) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Lorna M. DiMella-Deem. (pne) |
Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Linda Eichen. (pne) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Hal B. Greenwald. (pne) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Joseph A. Egitto. (pne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.