Abed v. Rogers et al
| Nabela Abed |
| Debra A Rogers, Lee Francis Cisna, Kirstjen Michele NIELSEN, Lee Cisna and Kirstjen Nielsen |
| 7:2019cv00239 |
| January 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Nelson Stephen Roman |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. § 551 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Simon Nakajima on behalf of Lee Cisna, Kirstjen Nielsen, Debra A Rogers. (Nakajima, Simon) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus, served. Lee Cisna served on 2/12/2019, answer due 4/15/2019; Kirstjen Nielsen served on 2/12/2019, answer due 4/15/2019; Debra A Rogers served on 2/12/2019, answer due 4/15/2019. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Nabela Abed. (Bowen, David) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Lee Cisna, Kirstjen Nielsen, Debra A Rogers. (dnh) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Debra A. Rogers, Lee Cisna and Kirstjen Nielsen, re: #5 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Nabela Abed. (Bowen, David) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney David Alanzo Bowen to RE-FILE Document No. #7 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): 'As to' Error; the wrong party as to whom the summons is being requested was selected. 'C/o' Error; 'c/o' or 'via' must be included before second party name (For example, Debra A. Rogers c/o USCIS Potomac Service Center). Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (dnh) |
| Filing 7 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST As To - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Nabela Abed, re: #5 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Nabela Abed. (Bowen, David) Modified on 1/31/2019 (dnh). |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney David Alanzo Bowen to RE-FILE Document No. #6 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): 'As to' Error; all of the parties as to whom the summons is being requested must be reflected in the 'As to' docket entry. 'C/o' Error; 'c/o' or 'via' must be included before second party name. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (dnh) |
| Filing 6 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST As To - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Nabela Abed, re: #5 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Nabela Abed. (Bowen, David) Modified on 1/22/2019 (dnh). |
| Filing 5 PETITION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Lee Cisna, Kirstjen Nielsen, Debra A Rogers.Document filed by Nabela Abed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E)(Bowen, David) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney David Alanzo Bowen to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the names of all the parties for whom the summons is being requested must be entered on the docket entry text; attorney information was not entered on the summons request PDF; summons is linked to a pleading that was not accepted by the court. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (pne) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney David Alanzo Bowen to RE-FILE Document No. #4 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): party names were modified due to typographical errors; the names of the parties the pleading is against are incorrect on the docket entry. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (pne) |
| Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney David Alanzo Bowen. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Lee Cisna, Kirstjen Nielsen. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error. (pne) |
| Filing 4 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR - PETITION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Lee Francis Cisna, Kirstjen Michele NIELSEN, Debra A Rogers.Document filed by Nabela Abed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E)(Bowen, David) Modified on 1/17/2019 (pne). |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney David Alanzo Bowen to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Petition (Other),. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong event type was used to file the pleading;. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. If the deficiency/deficiencies are not corrected within five (5) days per Amended Standing Order 15-mc-00131 this case will be administratively closed. Initial Pleading due by 1/15/2019. (pne) |
| Filing 3 FILING ERROR PDF ERROR - SUMMONS NOT LINKED TO CORRESPONDING PLEADING- REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Nabela Abed, re: #1 Petition (Other),. Document filed by Nabela Abed. (Bowen, David) Modified on 1/17/2019 (pne). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Bowen, David) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - PETITION FOR AN ACTION OF MANDAMUS. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16163982).Document filed by Nabela Abed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E)(Bowen, David) Modified on 1/10/2019 (pne). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
