Caballero et al v. V. Civitano Landscaping, Ltd. et al
Angel Caballero and Roberto Caballero |
Vincent Civitano and V. Civitano Landscaping, Ltd. |
7:2019cv00292 |
January 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Vincent L Briccetti |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE OF MEDIATOR ASSIGNMENT - Notice of assignment of mediator. Mediator Schedule due by 3/11/2019.(mf) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Vincent Civitano served on 1/17/2019, answer due 3/11/2019. Service was accepted by John Doe - Co-Worker. Document filed by Angel Caballero; Roberto Caballero. (Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 12 MEDIATION REFERRAL ORDER FOR CASES FILED UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT 29 U.S.C. Sec. 201 et seq. This case, involving claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 201 et seq., has been assigned to this Court for all purposes. In the Courts experience, cases involving FLSA claims often benefit from early mediation. To that end, prior to a Rule 16(b) case management conference the Court is referring this case to the Mediation Office for settlement purposes under Local Civil Rule 83.9. To facilitate mediation the parties shall, within four weeks of this Order, confer and provide the items set forth in this Order. Mediator to be Assigned by 2/11/2019. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 8/31/2016) (mf) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE: THIS MATTER HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR AN INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, on 4/15/2019 at 9:15 a.m., at the United States Courthouse, 300 Quarropas Street, Courtroom 620, White Plains, NY 10601. Initial Conference set for 4/25/2019 at 09:15 AM in Courtroom 620, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Vincent L. Briccetti. (mml) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION AND ORDER. IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties in the above captioned action, acting by means of their respective counsel, that the statute of limitations for the putative opt-in Plaintiffs' claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, is tolled from January 23, 2019 up to and including March 11, 2019 or the date an Answer is filed before March 11, 2019; IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties in the above captioned action, acting by means of their respective counsel, that the Defendants and each of them, hereby accept service of the Plaintiff's Complaint through their undersigned counsel and waive all defenses concerning service of process; IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties in the above captioned action, acting by means of their respective counsel, that the Defendants and each of them, shall answer the Plaintiff's complaint, in the above action on or before March 11, 2019, and as further set forth in this Stipulation and Order. So ordered. Vincent Civitano answer due 3/11/2019; V. Civitano Landscaping, Ltd. answer due 3/11/2019. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 1/25/2019) (rjm) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by William David Frumkin on behalf of Vincent Civitano, V. Civitano Landscaping, Ltd.. (Frumkin, William) |
Filing 8 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Vincent Civitano, V. Civitano Landscaping, Ltd.. (Frumkin, William) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. V. Civitano Landscaping, Ltd. served on 1/14/2019, answer due 2/4/2019. Service was accepted by Nancy Dougherty Authorized Agent Secretary of State. Document filed by Angel Caballero; Roberto Caballero. (Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Vincent Civitano, V. Civitano Landscaping, Ltd.. (pc) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vincent L. Briccetti. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pc) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Amit Kumar. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Angel Caballero, Roberto Caballero. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (pc) |
Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pc) |
Filing 5 CONSENT TO JOIN CLASS. Document filed by Roberto Caballero.(Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 4 CONSENT TO JOIN CLASS. Document filed by Angel Caballero.(Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to V. Civitano Landscaping, Ltd., and Vincent Civitano, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Angel Caballero, Roberto Caballero. (Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Vincent Civitano, V. Civitano Landscaping, Ltd.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16172990)Document filed by Angel Caballero, Roberto Caballero.(Kumar, Amit) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.