Disisto v. City of New Rochelle et al
Plaintiff: Jason Disisto
Defendant: City of New Rochelle, New Rochelle Police Department, John Does #1-5 and John Does #1-5, Individually
Case Number: 7:2019cv01140
Filed: February 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Cathy Seibel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2019 NOTICE OF MEDIATOR ASSIGNMENT - Notice of assignment of mediator.(mf)
March 21, 2019 NOTICE OF SELECTION FOR MEDIATION: This case has been selected for participation in the Southern District of New York's mediation program.(mf)
March 21, 2019 1983 PLAN 100-DAY REVIEW: The mediator shall be available to the parties throughout the discovery phase of the Plan and shall schedule and hold the first mediation session in the case within ten (10) days of the close of the discovery period. In the event that the mediation cannot begin within the time set forth herein, the assigned mediator shall promptly notify the Mediation Supervisor of the date by which the mediation will begin and the reason for the delay. The mediator shall correspond with the Mediation Office to arrange a mutually convenient date and time to hold the first session. 1983-Plan Review due by 7/1/2019. Mediator to be Assigned by 4/1/2019.(mf)
March 15, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE OF INITIAL COURT CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 7/17/2019 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Cathy Seibel. (anc)
March 15, 2019 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint. Document filed by City of New Rochelle, New Rochelle Police Department.(Stern, Steven)
February 19, 2019 Filing 6 STIPULATION: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the respective parties herein, that defendant CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE and NEW ROCHELLE POLICE DEPARTMENT's time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to and including March 15, 2019. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendants, CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE and NEW ROCHELLE POLICE DEPARTMENT waive any defenses or objections to personal jurisdiction or service of the summons and complaint herein. City of New Rochelle answer due 3/15/2019; New Rochelle Police Department answer due 3/15/2019. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/19/2019) (mml)
February 19, 2019 Filing 5 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by City of New Rochelle, New Rochelle Police Department. (Stern, Steven)
February 15, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by James Monteleon on behalf of Jason Disisto. (Monteleon, James)
February 8, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF PARTICIPATION IN 1983 PLAN: Unless otherwise ordered, this case shall participate in the Southern District of New York's 1983 Plan. Please reference the Court's website, www.nysd.uscourts.gov/mediation, to review the 1983 Plan for White Plains, effective October 3, 2016, for important information.(rpr)
February 7, 2019 ADD PARTY FOR PLEADING. Defendants/Respondents John Does #1-5, Individually added. Party added pursuant to #1 Notice of Removal,.Document filed by New Rochelle Police Department, City of New Rochelle. Related document: #1 Notice of Removal,.(Stern, Steven)
February 7, 2019 Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne)
February 7, 2019 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Cathy Seibel. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne)
February 7, 2019 Case Designated ECF. (pne)
February 7, 2019 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Steven Charles Stern. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Origin code 1 (Original Proceeding); Jury Demand code p (Plaintiff). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Origin code has been modified to 2 (Removal from State Court); the Jury Demand code has been modified to d (Defendant). (pne)
February 7, 2019 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Steven Charles Stern re: Document No. #1 Notice of Removal,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): all of the parties listed on the pleading were not entered on CM ECF; John Does #1-5 must be added to CM ECF a second time, with party text 'individually'. Docket the event type Add Party to Pleading found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents. **DO NOT USE GOOGLE CHROME OR SAFARI BROWSERS** (pne)
February 7, 2019 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Steven Charles Stern. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: John Does #1-5. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (pne)
February 6, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Stern, Steven)
February 6, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Westchester. Case Number: 51118/2019. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16304599).Document filed by New Rochelle Police Department, City of New Rochelle. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Summons and Complaint)(Stern, Steven)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Disisto v. City of New Rochelle et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Disisto
Represented By: James Monteleon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of New Rochelle
Represented By: Steven Charles Stern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New Rochelle Police Department
Represented By: Steven Charles Stern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does #1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does #1-5, Individually
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?