Mid-Hudson Properties, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
Mid-Hudson Properties, Inc. |
The Netherlands Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company |
7:2019cv01167 |
February 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Nelson Stephen Roman |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 nr |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint. Document filed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, The Netherlands Insurance Company.(Finazzo, Christopher) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO ANSWER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for Plaintiff Mid-Hudson Properties, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and counsel for Defendants Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and The Netherlands Insurance Company ("Defendants") that Defendants' time to answer or otherwise move in response to the Complaint is extended up to and including March 1, 2019. SO ORDERED., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company answer due 3/1/2019; The Netherlands Insurance Company answer due 3/1/2019. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 2/14/2019) (rj) |
Filing 6 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, The Netherlands Insurance Company. (Wolf, Robert) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Robert Mitchell Wolf on behalf of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, The Netherlands Insurance Company. (Wolf, Robert) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christopher Steven Finazzo on behalf of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, The Netherlands Insurance Company. (Finazzo, Christopher) |
Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (jgo) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (jgo) |
Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Holding Company Inc., Other Affiliate Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Other Affiliate Liberty Insurance Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate Peerless Insurance Company of LIH US P&C, Other Affiliate Peerless Insurance Company for The Netherlands Insurance Company; Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Holding Company Inc., Other Affiliate Liberty Mutual Group Inc., Other Affiliate LMHC Massachusetts Holdings Inc. for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Document filed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, The Netherlands Insurance Company.(Finazzo, Christopher) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Finazzo, Christopher) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of Dutchess. Case Number: 50045/2019. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16309303).Document filed by The Netherlands Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Certificate of Service)(Finazzo, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.