Brefo v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
James Brefo |
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N. A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
7:2019cv01338 |
February 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Cathy Seibel |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1693 ef |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (dnh) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to JPMorgan Chase, N.A., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by James Brefo. (Schlanger, Daniel) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Daniel Adam Schlanger. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Arbitration code e (Exempt); County code Albany. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Arbitration code has been deleted; the County code has been modified to XX Out of State. (pne) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Daniel Adam Schlanger to RE-FILE Document No. #4 Request for Issuance of Amended Summons,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong event type was used to file the request for issuance of summons; summons requested is not an Amended Summons. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (pne) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Daniel Adam Schlanger. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps. (pne) |
Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Cathy Seibel. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne) |
Filing 4 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT SUMMONS REQUEST - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF AMENDED SUMMONS as to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by James Brefo. (Schlanger, Daniel) Modified on 2/13/2019 (pne). |
Filing 3 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by James Brefo. (Schlanger, Daniel) Modified on 2/12/2019 (pne). |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Schlanger, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N. A.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16336623)Document filed by James Brefo.(Schlanger, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.