Ramos v. Saul
Marc Ramos |
Andrew M. Saul |
Social Security Administration |
1:2019cv08298 |
September 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Edgardo Ramos |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Andrew M. Saul. (gp) |
Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/17/2019) (jwh) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER IN RE MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 16-MISC-171 Standing Order filed April 28, 2016). ORDERED that in all Social Security cases hereafter filed under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. 1383(c)(3), the defendant shall within 90 days after service file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings, which shall constitute the defendants' answer, or otherwise move against the complaint... that unless otherwise ordered by the judge to whom the case is assigned, in cases where the plaintiff is represented by counsel, the plaintiff shall file a motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the defendant files the certified transcript of the administrative proceedings... that in cases where the plaintiff is appearing pro se, the defendant shall file its motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the certified transcript of administrative proceedings have been filed... (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/20/2016) (gp) |
Transmission to Case Assignment Clerk. Transmitted re: #5 Amended Civil Case Administrative Closing Order,,,,, to the Case Assignment Clerk for preparation of notice of case assignment/reassignment. (gp) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Judge Colleen McMahon is no longer assigned to the case. (wb) |
Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (wb) |
Filing 7 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Marc Ramos.(Insler, Lewis) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPLICATION TO REOPEN CASE: Pursuant to Amended Standing Order (15-MC-131):. The deficiency(ies) has been cured and the party(ies) seek to reopen the civil case. (Insler, Lewis) |
Filing 5 AMENDED CASE OPENING ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING ORDER: New civil actions filed electronically that contain the following deficiencies may be administratively closed without prejudice and summonses may not be issued unless the deficiency is corrected within five (5) days of electronic transmission by the Clerk of a Notice of Deficient Filing: The filing fee due was not paid either in whole or in part.. Where a new civil action is administratively closed for a reason listed above and the party cures the deficiency within 60 days of the case closing, the party should seek to reopen the case by electronically filing a Notice of Application to Reopen Case through the ECF system. Such Notice shall describe the efforts to cure the deficiency and seek to reopen the case. The Clerk shall review such Notice and, if the deficiency is satisfactorily cured, reopen and randomly reassign the case. Applications to reopen such administratively closed cases filed after 60 days of closing must proceed by motion. Administrative Reopening due by 11/12/2019. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 3/7/2017) (gp) |
Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Colleen McMahon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (gp) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Lewis Bart Insler. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Andrew M. Saul. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (dnh) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - PDF ERROR. Notice to Attorney Lewis Bart Insler to RE-FILE Document #3 Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. PDF ERROR; the second page of Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs was omitted from the PDF. (dnh) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO PAY THE FILING FEE. Notice to Attorney Lewis Bart Insler. Civil Case Opening Fee of $400 Due: for #1 Complaint. The filing fee due was not paid; either in whole or in part. If the filing fee is not paid within five (5) days, per Amended Standing Order 15-mc-131, this case will be administratively closed. Filing Fee due by 9/11/2019. (dnh) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Insler, Lewis) |
Filing 3 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Marc Ramos.(Insler, Lewis) Modified on 9/6/2019 (dnh). |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Andrew M. Saul, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Marc Ramos. (Insler, Lewis) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul. Document filed by Marc Ramos.(Insler, Lewis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.