Luctama et al v. Knickerbocker
| Lawdy Luctama and Ashney Luctama |
| Jeffrey Marks Knickerbocker |
| 7:2019cv08717 |
| September 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Vincent L Briccetti |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1396 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 FIRST LETTER addressed to Judge Vincent L. Briccetti from Richard Adam dated September 27, 2019 re: Venue. Document filed by Ashney Luctama, Lawdy Luctama.(Adam, Richard) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Accordingly, by September 27, 2019, plaintiff's shall file a letter explaining in adequate detail (i) the parties' citizenship for purposes of diversity jurisdiction; and (ii) why venue is proper in the Southern District of New York or, in the alternative, whether the case should be transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 9/20/2019) (mml)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jeffrey Marks Knickerbocker. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vincent L. Briccetti. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Richard Adam. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $1,000,000,000; Arbitration code e (Exempt); Fee Status code due (due);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to blank; the Arbitration code has been deleted; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid);. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Richard Adam to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Civil cover sheet was not signed. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Richard Adam. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Jeffrey Marks Knickerbocker, Lawdy Luctama, Ashney Luctama. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly;. (pc) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Adam, Richard) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Jeffrey Marks Knickerbocker, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Ashney Luctama, Lawdy Luctama. (Adam, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jeffrey Marks Knickerbocker. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17629445)Document filed by Lawdy Luctama, Ashney Luctama.(Adam, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
