Azzara v. United States of America
| Paul Azzara |
| United States of America |
| 7:2019cv08739 |
| September 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Kenneth M Karas |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed a copy of #3 Transfer Order U.S.C.A., to Paul Azzara 6 Balmoral Drive Chestnut Ridge, NY 10977. (aea) |
| Non-Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Non-Appeal Electronic Files for #3 Transfer Order U.S.C.A., were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (tp) |
Filing 3
TRANSFER ORDER: The Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of this order to Movant. In the interest of justice, the Court transfers this submission to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit as a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255. See 28 U.S.C. 1631; Liriano v. United States, 95 F.3d 119, 122-23 (2d Cir. 1996). This order closes this action. If the Court of Appeals authorizes Movant to proceed in this matter, he shall move to reopen this action under this action's civil docket number. As the motion makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 10/22/2019) (rro) Transmission to Appeals Clerk. Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing.
|
| Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #3 Transfer Order U.S.C.A. to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (rro) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (28 U.S.C. 2255). NO FURTHER ENTRIES. PLEASE SEE CRIMINAL CASE: 7:02-cr-01446-KMK-1. Document filed by Paul Azzara. (sac) |
| CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 7:02-cr-01446-KMK. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
| Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Azzara v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Paul Azzara | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
