Niesslein v. Roche Diagnostics Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Kathryn Niesslein
Defendant: MDINR, LLC and Roche Diagnostics Corporation
Case Number: 7:2019cv10328
Filed: November 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Nelson Stephen Roman
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pl
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2020 Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. MDINR, LLC waiver sent on 11/27/2019, answer due 1/27/2020. Document filed by Kathryn Niesslein. (Luhana, Roopal)
January 3, 2020 Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Roche Diagnostics Corporation served on 11/13/2019, answer due 1/15/2020. Service was accepted by Jiancarlos Degracia, PROCESS SPECIALIST. Document filed by Kathryn Niesslein. (Luhana, Roopal)
December 6, 2019 Filing 12 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Roche Holding Ltd. (Switzerland), Corporate Parent Roche Holdings, Inc. (Delaware) for Roche Diagnostics Corporation. Document filed by Roche Diagnostics Corporation.(Bui, Thuy)
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Defendant Roche granted an extension of time until January 15, 2020 to respond to the Complaint. Clerk of the Court requested to terminate the motion (doc. 10). Roche Diagnostics Corporation answer due 1/15/2020. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 12/4/2019) (rj)
December 3, 2019 Filing 10 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Complaint addressed to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman from Thuy T. Bui dated December 3, 2019. Document filed by Roche Diagnostics Corporation.(Bui, Thuy)
December 3, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Thuy Trang Bui on behalf of Roche Diagnostics Corporation. (Bui, Thuy)
November 19, 2019 Filing 8 ELECTRONIC AMENDED SUMMONS ISSUED as to MDINR, LLC. (sj)
November 18, 2019 Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF AMENDED SUMMONS as to MDINR, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kathryn Niesslein. (Luhana, Roopal)
November 7, 2019 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Roche Diagnostics Corporation. (pne)
November 7, 2019 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to MDINR, LLC. (pne)
November 7, 2019 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Roopal Premchand Luhana. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Orange. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of State. (pne)
November 7, 2019 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne)
November 7, 2019 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Roopal Premchand Luhana. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Kathryn Niesslein. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (pne)
November 7, 2019 Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne)
November 7, 2019 Case Designated ECF. (pne)
November 6, 2019 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to MDINR, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kathryn Niesslein. (Luhana, Roopal)
November 6, 2019 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Roche Diagnostics Corporation, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kathryn Niesslein. (Luhana, Roopal)
November 6, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Luhana, Roopal)
November 6, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MDINR, LLC, Roche Diagnostics Corporation. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17908667)Document filed by Kathryn Niesslein.(Luhana, Roopal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Niesslein v. Roche Diagnostics Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MDINR, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roche Diagnostics Corporation
Represented By: Thuy Trang Bui
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathryn Niesslein
Represented By: Roopal Premchand Luhana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?