Tepper et al v. Santander Bank, N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Tepper and Rebecca Rufo-Tepper
Defendant: SANTANDER BANK, N.A. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 7:2020cv00501
Filed: January 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Kenneth M Karas
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 294
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #15 Letter Response to Defendants Pre-Motion Letter filed by Daniel Tepper, Rebecca Rufo-Tepper. ENDORSEMENT: Granted. So Ordered., (Amended Pleadings due by 3/27/2020.) (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/14/20) (yv)
March 13, 2020 Filing 15 LETTER addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Janine L. Pollack dated March 13, 2020 re: Plaintiffs Response to Defendants Pre-Motion Letter. Document filed by Rebecca Rufo-Tepper, Daniel Tepper..(Liskow, Michael)
March 6, 2020 Filing 14 LETTER addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Alan E. Schoenfeld dated March 6, 2020 re: Pre-motion letter addressed to Plaintiffs' Counsel noting deficiencies in the Complaint,. Document filed by Santander Bank, N.A...(Schoenfeld, Alan)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting #12 Motion for Alejandro Mayorkas to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 2/10/2020) (rj)
February 7, 2020 Filing 12 MOTION for Alejandro Mayorkas to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-18728602. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Santander Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Alejandro Mayorkas in Support, #2 Certificate of Good Standing - DC, #3 Certificate of Good Standing - CA, #4 Text of Proposed Order).(Mayorkas, Alejandro)
February 7, 2020 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #12 MOTION for Alejandro Mayorkas to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-18728602. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (aea)
January 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Alan Schoenfeld dated January 30, 2020. Document filed by Santander Bank, N.A. Granted. So ordered. Santander Bank, N.A. answer due 3/6/2020. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 1/30/2020) (rjm)
January 30, 2020 Filing 10 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Alan Schoenfeld dated January 30, 2020. Document filed by Santander Bank, N.A..(Schoenfeld, Alan)
January 30, 2020 Filing 9 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Santander Holdings USA, Inc., Other Affiliate Banco Santander, S. A. for Santander Bank, N.A.. Document filed by Santander Bank, N.A..(Schoenfeld, Alan)
January 30, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Alan Schoenfeld on behalf of Santander Bank, N.A.. (Schoenfeld, Alan)
January 30, 2020 Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Santander Bank, N.A. served on 1/24/2020, answer due 2/14/2020. Service was accepted by Tracey Johnson, Branch Manager. Document filed by Daniel Tepper; Rebecca Rufo-Tepper. (Liskow, Michael)
January 21, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Janine Lee Pollack on behalf of Rebecca Rufo-Tepper, Daniel Tepper. (Pollack, Janine)
January 21, 2020 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Santander Bank, N.A.. (sj)
January 21, 2020 Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Santander Bank, N.A.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-18555153)Document filed by Daniel Tepper, Rebecca Rufo-Tepper.(Liskow, Michael)
January 21, 2020 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Michael Milton Liskow to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the pleading was not signed by filing attorney. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (sj)
January 21, 2020 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Michael Milton Liskow. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Daniel Tepper; Santander Bank, N.A.. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps; party text was omitted. (sj)
January 21, 2020 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Kenneth M. Karas. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions. (sj)
January 21, 2020 Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj)
January 21, 2020 Case Designated ECF. (sj)
January 20, 2020 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Santander Bank, N.A., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Rebecca Rufo-Tepper, Daniel Tepper. (Liskow, Michael)
January 20, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Liskow, Michael)
January 20, 2020 Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SIGNATURE ERROR - COMPLAINT against Does 1 through 10, inclusive, SANTANDER BANK, N.A.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-18545526)Document filed by Daniel Tepper, Rebecca Rufo-Tepper.(Liskow, Michael) Modified on 1/21/2020 (sj).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tepper et al v. Santander Bank, N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Tepper
Represented By: Michael Milton Liskow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Rufo-Tepper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SANTANDER BANK, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?