Kemp v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
| Kemp and Denise Kemp |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
| 7:2020cv02270 |
| March 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Nelson Stephen Roman |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 fm |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Stephen Bergstein on behalf of Denise Kemp..(Bergstein, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: The Court waives the Initial Pre-trial Conference and directs the parties to complete a Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order (blank form attached hereto). Said Scheduling Order shall be submitted to chambers by April 23, 2020. After review and approval of the Scheduling Order, the Court will issue an Order of Reference to Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy for general pretrial purposes. The parties are directed to contact Judge McCarthy within seven (7) business days of the date of the Order of Reference to schedule a conference. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 3/24/2020) (rj)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Megan Sarah Goddard on behalf of Denise Kemp..(Goddard, Megan)
|
|
Filing 7
ANSWER to Complaint. Document filed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc...(Clark, Shawn)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
|
|
Filing 6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #4 Notice of Appearance, and #5 Notice of Appearance served on Megan S. Goddard and Steve Bergstein on March 13, 2020. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc...(Clark, Shawn)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Shawn Matthew Clark on behalf of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc...(Clark, Shawn)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Craig Robert Benson on behalf of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc...(Benson, Craig)
|
|
Filing 3
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Other Affiliate Sanofi for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Document filed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc...(Benson, Craig)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Benson, Craig)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of Westchester. Case Number: 68499/2019. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-19107963).Document filed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Summons with Notice, #2 Exhibit B: Demand for Complaint, #3 Exhibit C: Stipulation, #4 Exhibit D: Complaint, #5 Exhibit E: Notice to Clerk of Supreme Court, #6 Exhibit F: Notice to Adverse Party).(Benson, Craig)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
