National Products Inc. v. Mamiya America Corporation et al
National Products Inc. |
Mamiya America Corporation, dba MAC Group and Kupo Co. Ltd. |
7:2020cv03148 |
April 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by National Products Inc...(Tellekson, David) |
Filing 5 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Tellekson, David) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Tellekson, David) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to KUPO CO. LTD., re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by National Products Inc...(Tellekson, David) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to MAMIYA AMERICA CORPORATION, d/b/a MAC GROUP, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by National Products Inc...(Tellekson, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kupo Co. Ltd., Mamiya America Corporation, dba MAC Group. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-19508433)Document filed by National Products Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended Consent Judgment (9 pp), #2 Exhibit B - Hourglass Trade Dress Reg. 4,254,086 (3 pp)).(Tellekson, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.