Bowens v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
| Samuel Bowens |
| Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. |
| 7:2020cv04197 |
| June 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Philip M Halpern |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Application granted. Defendant shall answer or move by August 13, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 7/21/2020) Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. answer due 8/13/2020 (ks)
|
| Filing 6 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc...(Szyba, Robert) |
| Filing 5 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Philip M. Halpern from Robert Szyba dated July 20, 2020. Document filed by Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Stipulation Extending Time to Answer).(Szyba, Robert) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc...(jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Philip M. Halpern. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Samuel Bowens..(Leonard, Shelly) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Leonard, Shelly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-20071025)Document filed by Samuel Bowens..(Leonard, Shelly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bowens v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Samuel Bowens | |
| Represented By: | Shelly A. Leonard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Robert Tadeusz Szyba |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
