Swetz v. GSK Consumer Health, Inc.
| Susan Swetz |
| GSK Consumer Health, Inc. |
| 7:2020cv04731 |
| June 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Nelson Stephen Roman |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 fr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
LETTER MOTION for Conference addressed to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman from Daniel Tehrani dated August 13, 2020. Document filed by GSK Consumer Health, Inc...(Tehrani, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 6
LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time addressed to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman from Daniel Tehrani dated July 13, 2014. Document filed by GSK Consumer Health, Inc...(Tehrani, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. The application is granted. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 7/13/2020) (rj)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: GSK Consumer Health, Inc. answer due 8/13/2020. (rj)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel Ben Tehrani on behalf of GSK Consumer Health, Inc...(Tehrani, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to GSK Consumer Health, Inc...(pc)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (pc)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Sultzer, Jason)
|
|
Filing 2
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to GSK Consumer Health, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Susan Swetz..(Sultzer, Jason)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against GSK Consumer Health, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-20340445)Document filed by Susan Swetz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit).(Sultzer, Jason)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Swetz v. GSK Consumer Health, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GSK Consumer Health, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Daniel B. Tehrani |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Susan Swetz | |
| Represented By: | Jason P. Sultzer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
