Rosellini v. Lane et al
KENNETH ROSELLINI |
SEAN H LANE and Sean H. Lane |
7:2020cv05434 |
July 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Nelson Stephen Roman |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 b |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: #8 Order of Dismissal in favor of Sean H. Lane against Kenneth Rosellini. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated July 21, 2020, Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as barred by judicial immunity and as frivolous. Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief is denied as moot; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 7/21/2020) (Attachments: #1 Right to Appeal) (km) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. |
![]() |
Mailed a copy of #8 Order of Dismissal, #9 Clerk's Judgment (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal), to Kenneth J. Rosellini at 636a Van Houten Avenue, Clifton, NJ 07013. (dsh) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Sean H. Lane(in his official capacity)..(jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Kenneth J. Rosellini to RE-FILE Document No. #5 Request for Issuance of Summons,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): second party name on the PDF 'To' section must include 'care of c/o' or 'via';. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (jgo) |
Filing 5 FILING ERROR - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Sean H. Lane, in his individual capacity, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kenneth Rosellini..(Rosellini, Kenneth) Modified on 7/17/2020 (jgo). |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Sean H. Lane, in his official capacity, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kenneth Rosellini..(Rosellini, Kenneth) |
ADD PARTY FOR PLEADING. Defendants/Respondents All Defendants added. Party added pursuant to #1 Complaint.Document filed by Kenneth Rosellini. Related document: #1 Complaint..(Rosellini, Kenneth) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Kenneth J. Rosellini to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): party name must be added in official capacity in order for a summons is issued; second party name on the PDF 'To' section must include 'care of c/o' or 'via';. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (jgo) |
Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Kenneth J. Rosellini re: Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): all of the parties listed on the pleading were not entered on CM ECF; add party Sean H. Lane with party text 'in his official capacity'. Docket the event type Add Party to Pleading found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents... (jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Kenneth J. Rosellini. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $100,001,000; Arbitration code v (Voluntary); County code Westchester;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to none; the Arbitration code has been deleted; the County code has been modified to XX Out of State;. (jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Kenneth J. Rosellini. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: KENNETH ROSELLINI; SEAN H LANE. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps; party text was omitted;. (jgo) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
Filing 3 FILING ERROR - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Sean H. Lane, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by KENNETH ROSELLINI..(Rosellini, Kenneth) Modified on 7/16/2020 (jgo). |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rosellini, Kenneth) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SEAN H LANE. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-20692481)Document filed by KENNETH ROSELLINI..(Rosellini, Kenneth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.