Passero et al v. Ford et al
Laura Katzenberger, Handspring Management, Inc., Prosthetic and Orthotic Associates, Inc., Handspring Rehabilitation, LLC and Thomas Passero |
Mark Ford and Randolph Schmitke |
7:2020cv05631 |
July 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 jd |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Handspring Management, Inc., Handspring Rehabilitation, LLC, Laura Katzenberger, Thomas Passero, Prosthetic and Orthotic Associates, Inc...(Gillett, David) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Thomas Passero, Laura Katzenberger, Prosthetic and Orthotic Associates, Inc., Handspring Rehabilitation, LLC, Handspring Management Company, Inc., re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Handspring Management, Inc., Handspring Rehabilitation, LLC, Laura Katzenberger, Thomas Passero, Prosthetic and Orthotic Associates, Inc...(Gillett, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark Ford, Randolph Schmitke. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-20778510)Document filed by Thomas Passero, Handspring Rehabilitation, LLC, Prosthetic and Orthotic Associates, Inc., Laura Katzenberger, Handspring Management, Inc...(Gillett, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.