Turturro v. Saul
Plaintiff: Michelle L Turturro
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2020cv07239
Filed: September 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Sarah Netburn
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE: IT IS ORDERED: This case is referred to a United States magistrate judge to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. (Case No Longer Referred to Magistrate Judge) CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 10/19/2020) (jca)
October 1, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph Anthony Pantoja on behalf of Andrew Saul..(Pantoja, Joseph)
September 30, 2020 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint served. Document filed by Michelle L Turturro. Electronic Certified Administrative Record due by 12/14/2020..(Gogerty, Gary)
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER:On September 4, 2020, Plaintiff filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), seeking review of a denial of social security disability benefits. On September 9, 2020, the Honorable Paul G. Gardephe referred this case to my docket for a report and recommendation. The parties should follow the schedule set forth in the Standing Order at ECF No. 5. Requests for extensions of the deadlines set by this scheduling order may be granted by the Court, but only if they are made in advance of the deadline, and there is good reason provided for the request. Such requests shall be submitted in accordance with the Individual Practices of Judge Netburn, available at http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judge/Netburn. All other provisions as further set forth in this order. The parties shall advise the Court as to whether they jointly consent to decision of this action by this United States magistrate judge. If both parties consent, they should complete the counterparts of the Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge available on the Courts website at http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/consent-to-proceed-before-us-magistrate- judge and submit them to my chambers. If either or both parties do not consent, the assigned Assistant United States Attorney shall act as a liaison and report to chambers that the parties do not consent, without indicating any particular partys consent or non-consent. (In other words, the Court does not want to know that party A consents and party B does not.) This Order is not meant to interfere in any way with the parties absolute right to decision by a United States district judge but is merely an attempt at preserving scarce judicial resources and a reminder ofthe parties options under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to send this order to the U.S. AttorneysOffice for the Southern District of New York. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 9/17/2020) (js) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
September 17, 2020 Mailed a copy of #9 Scheduling Order, to United States Attorneys Office, Southern District of NY, 86 Chambers Street, New York, NY 10007. (dsh)
September 10, 2020 Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Andrew Saul. (sj)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Social Security. Referred to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 9/9/2020) (ks)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 9/9/2020) (jca)
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER IN RE MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 16-MISC-171 Standing Order filed April 28, 2016). ORDERED that in all Social Security cases hereafter filed under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. 1383(c)(3), the defendant shall within 90 days after service file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings, which shall constitute the defendants' answer, or otherwise move against the complaint... that unless otherwise ordered by the judge to whom the case is assigned, in cases where the plaintiff is represented by counsel, the plaintiff shall file a motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the defendant files the certified transcript of the administrative proceedings... that in cases where the plaintiff is appearing pro se, the defendant shall file its motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the certified transcript of administrative proceedings have been filed... (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/20/2016) (jgo)
September 8, 2020 Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
September 8, 2020 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul G. Gardephe. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
September 8, 2020 Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
September 4, 2020 Filing 4 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Michelle L Turturro..(Gogerty, Gary)
September 4, 2020 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Michelle L Turturro..(Gogerty, Gary)
September 4, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Gogerty, Gary)
September 4, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul. Document filed by Michelle L Turturro..(Gogerty, Gary)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Turturro v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Joseph Anthony Pantoja
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle L Turturro
Represented By: Gary James Gogerty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?