Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. v. Insight Photonics Solutions, Inc.
| Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. |
| Insight Photonics Solutions, Inc. |
| 7:2020cv07667 |
| September 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Nelson Stephen Roman |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by Insight Photonics Solutions, Inc...(Mitchell, Cynthia)
|
|
Filing 15
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Insight Photonics Solutions, Inc...(Mitchell, Cynthia)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting #11 Motion for Paul H. Schwartz to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 11. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 10/16/2020) (rj)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting #12 Motion for Cynthia Mitchell to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Clerk of Court is kindly requested to terminate the motion at ECF No. 12. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 10/16/2020) (rj)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION for Cynthia Mitchell to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-22155216. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Insight Photonics Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order).(Mitchell, Cynthia)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Paul H. Schwartz to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-22154942. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Insight Photonics Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order).(Schwartz, Paul)
|
|
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #11 MOTION for Paul H. Schwartz to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-22154942. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., #12 MOTION for Cynthia Mitchell to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-22155216. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER: granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The application is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 8. SO ORDERED. Insight Photonics Solutions, Inc. answer due 11/3/2020. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 10/08/2020) (ama)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joshua Richard Kornfield on behalf of Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc...(Kornfield, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 8
LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to the Complaint from October 13, 2020 to November 3, 2020 addressed to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman from Michael H. Bauscher dated October 6, 2020. Document filed by Insight Photonics Solutions, Inc...(Bauscher, Michael)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Helmut Bauscher on behalf of Insight Photonics Solutions, Inc...(Bauscher, Michael)
|
|
Filing 6
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Insight Photonics Solutions, Inc. served on 9/22/2020, answer due 10/13/2020. Service was accepted by Silvia Wiedman/Administrative Services Manager. Document filed by Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc...(Goldberger, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Insight Photonics Solutions, Inc...(pc)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Daniel Poul Goldberger. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $150,000,000,000; County code Westchester;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to $9,999,000; the County code has been modified to XX Out of State;. (pc)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (pc)
|
|
Filing 4
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Insight Photonics Solutions, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc...(Goldberger, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 3
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Carl Zeiss Meditec AG for Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.. Document filed by Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc...(Goldberger, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Goldberger, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Insight Photonics Solutions, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-21713918)Document filed by Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc...(Goldberger, Daniel)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
