Contemporary Visions, LLC v. Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GMBH & Co. Betriebs KG et al
Plaintiff: Contemporary Visions, LLC doing business as Sonneman A Way of Light
Defendant: ARNOLD & RICHTER CINE TECHNIK GMBH & CO, ARRI, Inc. and Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GMBH & Co. Betriebs KG
Case Number: 7:2020cv08744
Filed: October 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Kenneth M Karas
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 44
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2020 Filing 10 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(sj)
October 23, 2020 Filing 9 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Wax, Shane)
October 21, 2020 Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GMBH & Co. Betriebs KG..(pc)
October 21, 2020 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Arri, Inc...(pc)
October 21, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Shane Wax on behalf of Contemporary Visions, LLC..(Wax, Shane)
October 21, 2020 Case Designated ECF. (pc)
October 21, 2020 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO SUBMIT AO 120 FORM PATENT/TRADEMARK. Notice to Attorney Jonathan Marc Purow to submit a completed AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark to court for review. Use the event type AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark - Notice of Submission by Attorney found under the event list Other Documents. (pc)
October 21, 2020 Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
October 21, 2020 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Kenneth M. Karas. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
October 21, 2020 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Jonathan Marc Purow. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: ARNOLD & RICHTER CINE TECHNIK GMBH & CO. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps;. (pc)
October 20, 2020 Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to ARRI, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Contemporary Visions, LLC..(Purow, Jonathan)
October 20, 2020 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to ARNOLD & RICHTER CINE TECHNIK GMBH & CO. BETRIEBS KG, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Contemporary Visions, LLC..(Purow, Jonathan)
October 20, 2020 Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Dunes Point Capital, LP for Contemporary Visions, LLC. Document filed by Contemporary Visions, LLC..(Purow, Jonathan)
October 20, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Purow, Jonathan)
October 20, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Contemporary Visions, LLC. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-22224634)Document filed by Contemporary Visions, LLC..(Purow, Jonathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Contemporary Visions, LLC v. Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GMBH & Co. Betriebs KG et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Contemporary Visions, LLC doing business as Sonneman A Way of Light
Represented By: Jonathan Marc Purow
Represented By: Shane Wax
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARNOLD & RICHTER CINE TECHNIK GMBH & CO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARRI, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GMBH & Co. Betriebs KG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?