Nieves, Jr v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Oswaldo Nieves, Jr |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2020cv08873 |
| October 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Sarah L Cave |
| Alison J Nathan |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. § 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Commissioner of Social Security served on 12/16/2020, answer due 1/6/2021. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by Oswaldo Nieves, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Summons served Commissioner of Social Security c/o U.S. Attorney General, #2 Summons served Commissioner of Social Security c/o U.S. Attorney).(Osborn, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 13
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security..(jgo)
|
|
Filing 12
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security..(jgo)
|
|
Filing 11
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security..(jgo)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Social Security. Referred to Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/19/2020) (rjm)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. So ordered. Motions terminated: #6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Informa Pauperis filed by Oswaldo Nieves, Jr. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/19/2020) (rjm)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER. By separate order, the Court has assigned this case to the assigned Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendation on any motion for judgment on the pleadings. To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties must meet and confer to discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, and as further set forth in this Order. If either party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, within two weeks of the date on which Defendant notices an appearance, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/19/2020) (rjm)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER IN RE MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 16-MISC-171 Standing Order filed April 28, 2016). ORDERED that in all Social Security cases hereafter filed under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. 1383(c)(3), the defendant shall within 90 days after service file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings, which shall constitute the defendants' answer, or otherwise move against the complaint... that unless otherwise ordered by the judge to whom the case is assigned, in cases where the plaintiff is represented by counsel, the plaintiff shall file a motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the defendant files the certified transcript of the administrative proceedings... that in cases where the plaintiff is appearing pro se, the defendant shall file its motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the certified transcript of administrative proceedings have been filed... (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/20/2016) (jgo)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Leave to Proceed Informa Pauperis . Document filed by Oswaldo Nieves, Jr..(Osborn, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 5
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Commissioner of Social Security c/o U.S. Attorney, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Oswaldo Nieves, Jr..(Osborn, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 4
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Commissioner of Social Security c/o U.S. Attorney General, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Oswaldo Nieves, Jr..(Osborn, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Commissioner of Social Security, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Oswaldo Nieves, Jr..(Osborn, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Osborn, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Document filed by Oswaldo Nieves, Jr..(Osborn, Daniel)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
