Farkas v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
Rochel Farkas |
Equifax Information Services, LLC, Citibank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and TD Bank, N.A. |
7:2020cv10952 |
December 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Nelson Stephen Roman |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by TD Bank, N.A...(Barthel, Hailey) |
Filing 30 NOTICE of Settlement as to Equifax Information Services LLC. Document filed by Rochel Farkas..(Rozenberg, Mark) |
Filing 29 ORDER granting #20 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Defendant's application is GRANTED. Citibank, N.A., is directed to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before February 26, 2021. To the extent Citibank, N.A., intends to respond through motion practice, it is directed to consult this Court's local rules and timely submit a request for a pre-motion conference. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the Motion at ECF No. 20. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 2/2/21) (yv) |
Filing 28 ORDER granting #24 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Application is GRANTED. Defendant TD Bank USA, N.A. is permitted to respond to the Complaint on or before February 19, 2021. To the extent that it intends to respond through motion practice, it is directed to consult the Court's local rules and timely seek a pre-motion conference. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the Motion at ECF No. 24. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 2/2/21) (yv) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: TD Bank, N.A. answer due 2/19/2021. (yv) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Citibank, N.A. answer due 2/26/2021. (yv) |
Filing 27 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Justin Ward Lamson on behalf of Citibank, N.A...(Lamson, Justin) |
Filing 26 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Citigroup, Inc., Corporate Parent Citicorp for Citibank, N.A.. Document filed by Citibank, N.A...(Lamson, Justin) |
Filing 25 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Citibank, N.A. served on 1/8/2021, answer due 1/29/2021. Document filed by Rochel Farkas..(Rozenberg, Mark) |
Filing 24 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman from Hailey J. Barthel dated January 29, 2021. Document filed by TD Bank, N.A...(Barthel, Hailey) |
Filing 23 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Corporate Parent TD Bank US Holding Company, Corporate Parent TD Group US Holdings LLC for TD Bank, N.A.. Document filed by TD Bank, N.A...(Barthel, Hailey) |
Filing 22 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Hailey Jean Barthel on behalf of TD Bank, N.A...(Barthel, Hailey) |
Filing 21 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ellen Beth Silverman on behalf of TD Bank, N.A...(Silverman, Ellen) |
Filing 20 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint addressed to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman from Justin W. Lamson dated January 26, 2021. Document filed by Citibank, N.A...(Lamson, Justin) |
Filing 19 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A...(Turcotte, Christopher) |
Filing 18 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent JPMorgan Chase & Co. for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Document filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A...(Turcotte, Christopher) |
Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christopher Barry Turcotte on behalf of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A...(Turcotte, Christopher) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Application is GRANTED. Defendant Equifax is permitted to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before February 19, 2021. Equifax is reminded that, if it intends to respond to the Complaint through motion practice, it is required to comply with this Court's local rules including that it must first submit a letter requesting a pre-motion conference. The Court notes that other defendants, i.e., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Citibank, N.A., and TD Bank, N.A., have not yet made an appearance despite impending pleading deadlines. The parties are kindly asked to be mindful of preserving judicial resources by, for example, timely seeking extensions to deadlines rather than missing deadlines that may result in orders to show cause. The Clerk of the Court is kindly directed to terminate the Motion at ECF No. 15. So Ordered. (Equifax Information Services, LLC answer due 2/19/2021.) (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 1/20/21) (yv) |
Filing 15 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman from Equifax Information Services, LLC Re: Extension of Time to File Answer w/ Plaintiff's Consent dated January 20, 2021. Document filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC..(Brownstein, Boris) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Boris Brownstein on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLC..(Brownstein, Boris) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. served on 12/31/2020, answer due 1/21/2021. Document filed by Rochel Farkas..(Rozenberg, Mark) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 12/30/2020, answer due 1/20/2021. Document filed by Rochel Farkas..(Rozenberg, Mark) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. TD Bank, N.A. served on 12/30/2020, answer due 1/20/2021. Document filed by Rochel Farkas..(Rozenberg, Mark) |
Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Citibank, N.A...(pc) |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to TD Bank, N.A...(pc) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A...(pc) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Equifax Information Services, LLC..(pc) |
Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to TD Bank, N.A., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Rochel Farkas..(Rozenberg, Mark) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Rochel Farkas..(Rozenberg, Mark) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Citibank, N.A., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Rochel Farkas..(Rozenberg, Mark) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Equifax Information Services, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Rochel Farkas..(Rozenberg, Mark) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rozenberg, Mark) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Citibank, N.A., Equifax Information Services, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., TD Bank, N.A.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-23232490)Document filed by Rochel Farkas..(Rozenberg, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.