Hernandez v. Burlington Coat Factory of Texas, Inc.
| Maria Del Carmen Hernandez |
| Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Burlington Coat Factory of Texas, Inc. |
| 7:2021cv01123 |
| February 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Nelson Stephen Roman |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 t |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by Burlington Coat Factory of Texas, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit compliance in serving discovery).(Monn, Steven) |
| Filing 10 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Burlington Stores, Inc. for Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory of Texas, Inc.. Document filed by Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory of Texas, Inc...(Liao, Henry) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Steven Jay Monn on behalf of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory of Texas, Inc...(Monn, Steven) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Eugene M. Bellin on behalf of Maria Del Carmen Hernandez..(Bellin, Eugene) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Burlington Coat Factory of Texas, Inc. with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Maria Del Carmen Hernandez..(Ashman, Richard) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Richard A. Ashman on behalf of Maria Del Carmen Hernandez..(Ashman, Richard) |
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO AMEND PARTY AND CAPTION: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties that BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY OF TEXAS, INC. shall be substituted as defendant for and in the stead of BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORPORATION as BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY OF TEXAS, INC. is the operator and lessee of the subject retail store. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that plaintiff may within 30 days file an Amended Complaint to reflect the substitution without need for motion. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the defendant shall have 20 days from the filing of the Amended Complaint to file a responsive pleading. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the parties agree that the Clerk of the Court shall amend the caption as further set forth in this order. Parties stipulation is SO ORDERED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to substitute the defendant and amend the case caption as described herein. SO ORDERED., Burlington Coat Factory of Texas, Inc. added. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation terminated. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 2/26/2021) (rj)
|
| Filing 4 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation..(Liao, Henry) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Liao, Henry) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Henry Ling Ping Liao to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Notice of Removal,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong event type was used to file the civil cover sheet; Jury Demand code was not selected;. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. Use civil cover sheet issued by S.D.N.Y. dated October 1, 2020. The S.D.N.Y. Civil Cover Sheet dated October 1, 2020 is located at#http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/civil-cover-sheet.. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Henry Ling Ping Liao. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 42:1396; Origin code 1 (Original Proceeding); Dollar Demand $500,000,000; County code Bronx;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 28:1332; the Origin code has been modified to 2 (Removal from State Court); the Dollar Demand has been modified to none; the County code has been modified to XX Out of State;. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of Bronx. Case Number: 35303/2020E..Document filed by Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint).(Liao, Henry) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - NOTICE OF REMOVAL from New York State Supreme Court, County of Bronx. Case Number: 35303/2020E. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-23861427).Document filed by Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation..(Liao, Henry) Modified on 2/9/2021 (jgo). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
