Haass v. Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation
| Thomas Haass |
| Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation |
| 7:2021cv01290 |
| February 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Vincent L Briccetti |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 fr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW DAVID WAWRO AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT HOPKINS MANUFACTURING CORPORATION: Upon consideration of the motion to withdraw the appearance of David Wawro, formerly of Torys, LLP, as counsel for Defendant Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation and to remove his name from the ECF service list bearing Case No. 21-CV-01290 (VB), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Attorney David W.R. Wawro terminated. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 3/19/2021) (mml)
|
| Filing 14 PROPOSED ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY. Document filed by Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation..(Caparelli, Christopher) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 : By 4/23/2021, defendant shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint. The additional dates requested in defendant's letter are denied as premature without prejudice to refiling, if appropriate. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti)(Text Only Order) (elk)
|
| Filing 12 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint requesting time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint be extended to April 23, 2021 addressed to Judge Vincent L. Briccetti from Keara M. Gordon dated March 18, 2021. Document filed by Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation..(Gordon, Keara) |
| Filing 11 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Hopkins Acquisition, Inc., Other Affiliate Onex Corporation for Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation. Document filed by Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation..(Gordon, Keara) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Caroline A. Fish on behalf of Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation..(Fish, Caroline) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael George Lewis on behalf of Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation..(Lewis, Michael) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keara M. Gordon on behalf of Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation..(Gordon, Keara) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Letter Motion for Extension of Time: By 4/5/2021, defendant shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti)(Text Only Order) (elk)
|
| Filing 6 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint addressed to Judge Vincent L. Briccetti from David Wawro dated February 18, 2021. Document filed by Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation..(Wawro, David) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation served on 2/17/2021, answer due 3/10/2021. Service was accepted by David Wawro. Document filed by Thomas Haass..(Kopel, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation..(jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vincent L. Briccetti. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Thomas Haass..(Kopel, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kopel, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-23918526)Document filed by Thomas Haass..(Kopel, Yitzchak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Haass v. Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Caroline A. Fish |
| Represented By: | Keara M. Gordon |
| Represented By: | David W.R. Wawro |
| Represented By: | Michael George Lewis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas Haass | |
| Represented By: | Yitzchak Kopel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
