Hedick v. Spradling et al
| Eric H. Hedick |
| Kathleen Henricksen, Kelly Decker, Port Jervis Community Development Agency, City of Port Jervis, Daniel Rivera, Victoria Campell, Sally Von Sauer, Robin Waizeneggar, Theresa Spradling and Stephen Duryea |
| 7:2021cv05459 |
| June 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Cathy Seibel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 vc |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: Accordingly, Hedick shall file an Amended Complaint no later than September 8, 2021, setting forth any claims he believes he can bring on his individual behalf, and the factual bases for them. Failure to do so may result in dismissal without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Summonses will not issue at this time. If necessary, the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to issue summonses in a separate order. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiffs and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Amended Pleadings due by 9/8/2021.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/9/2021) (mml) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #5 Order, Set Deadlines, to Eric H. Hedick at 30 South Maple Street, Apt. 1, Port Jervis, NY 12771. (dsh) |
| Mailed a copy of #4 Order, to Eric H. Hedick at 30 South Maple Street, Apt. 1, Port Jervis, NY 12771. (dsh) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER:The Court dismisses Tournesol's claims without prejudice to Tournesol retaining counsel within 30 days of the date of this order. Summonses will not issue at this time. If necessary, the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to issue summonses in a separate order. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail one copy of this order to Plaintiffs and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/30/2021) (rro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Victoria Campell, City of Port Jervis, Kelly Decker, Stephen Duryea, Kathleen Henricksen, Port Jervis Community Development Agency, Daniel Rivera, Theresa Spradling, Sally Von Sauer, Robin Waizeneggar. (Filing Fee $402.00, Receipt Number 465407018549) Document filed by Eric H. Hedick. (sac) |
| Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
