Schmitz v. Kohls, Inc.
| Michelle Schmitz |
| Kohls, Inc. |
| 7:2021cv05640 |
| June 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Nelson Stephen Roman |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 ed |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Stephen Stecker on behalf of Kohls, Inc...(Stecker, Stephen) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE: Plaintiff Michelle Schmitz and Defendant Kohl's Inc., through their respective counsel, stipulate to extend the time for Defendant to file an answer or other responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint and in support state the following: 1. On June 29, 2021, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendant. See Doc. No. 1. 2. On June 30, 2021, Plaintiff sent Defendant a Waiver of Service of Summons. 3. On August 9, 2021, Defendant returned an executed Waiver of Service of Summons, thus setting August 30, 2021, as the deadline for Defendant to file an answer or other responsive pleading to Plaintiffs Complaint. See Doc. No. 3. 4. Because Anjanette Cabrera and Stephen Stecker (Defendant's counsel) are still in the process of contacting and interviewing witnesses, and because Mr. Stecker is unavailable from August 28 to September 7 due to an event for his wedding and a scheduled vacation, the parties agree that Defendant may have an additional twenty-one (21) days in which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. 5. Specifically, the parties agree that Defendant's answer or other responsive pleading to Plaintiffs Complaint shall now be filed on or before September 20, 2021. 6. This stipulation is not made for the purpose of delay but for good cause and in the interests of justice. 7. The parties agree that the extension of time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by the Court. 8. The Clerk of the Court is kindly directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 5., Kohls, Inc. answer due 9/20/2021., Motions terminated: #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File An Answer or Other Responsive Pleading. filed by Kohls, Inc.. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 8/25/2021) (rj) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File An Answer or Other Responsive Pleading. Document filed by Kohls, Inc...(Cabrera, Anjanette) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anjanette Cabrera on behalf of Kohls, Inc...(Cabrera, Anjanette) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Kohls, Inc. waiver sent on 6/30/2021, answer due 8/30/2021. Document filed by Kohls, Inc...(Stecker, Stephen) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Scott J. Steiner. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Michelle Schmitz; Kohls, Inc. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Scott J. Steiner. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Albany. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to Westchester. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Steiner, Scott) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR - COMPLAINT against Michelle Schmitz. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24733824)Document filed by Michelle Schmitz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Right to Sue).(Steiner, Scott) Modified on 6/30/2021 (vf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schmitz v. Kohls, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michelle Schmitz | |
| Represented By: | Scott J. Steiner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Alternative dispute resolution (adr) provider: Kohls, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
