Benedith v. White Plains Hospital
| Peter C. Benedith |
| White Plains Hospital |
| 7:2021cv08077 |
| September 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Cathy Seibel |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. White Plains Hospital, served on 10/25/2021, answer due 11/15/2021. Service was accepted by Jennifer Lopez. Document filed by Peter C. Benedith. (sc) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO AMEND: Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint that complies with the standards set fourth above. Plaintiff must submit the amended complaint to this Court's Pro Se Intake Unit within sixty days of the date of this order, caption the document as an "Amended Complaint," and label the document with docket number 21-CV-8077 (CS). An Amended Complaint for Employment Discrimination form is attached to this order. No summons will issue at this time. If Plaintiff fails to comply within the time allowed, and he cannot show good cause to excuse such failure, the complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has consented to electronic service. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/1/2021) (mml)
|
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to White Plains Hospital. (sha) |
| Mailed a copy of Summons Issued to Peter C. Benedith at 819 Santee Street, Apt. 905, Los Angeles, CA 90014. (sha) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to White Plains Hospital, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Peter C. Benedith. (sac) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PRO SE APPEARANCE by Peter C. Benedith. (sac) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Peter C. Benedith consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Peter C. Benedith. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against White Plains Hospital. (Filing Fee $402.00, Receipt Number 465407018682) Document filed by Peter C. Benedith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
| Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Benedith v. White Plains Hospital | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Peter C. Benedith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: White Plains Hospital | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
