Russett v. Kellogg Sales Company
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Russett
Defendant: Kellogg Sales Company
Case Number: 7:2021cv08572
Filed: October 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Nelson Stephen Roman
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 LETTER MOTION for Conference Re: Motion to Dismiss addressed to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman from Dean N. Panos dated March 4, 2022. The Court is in receipt of the attached letter motion from Defendant Kellogg Sales Company, dated March 4, 2022, seeking leave to file a motion to dismiss. The Court waives the pre-motion conference requirement and grants Defendant leave to file a motion to dismiss in accordance with the following briefing schedule: (1) Defendant's moving papers are to be served (not filed) on April 4, 2022; (2) Plaintiff's opposition papers are to be served (not filed) on May 4, 2022; and (3) Defendant's reply papers are to be served on May 19, 2022. All motion papers are to be filed by the parties on the reply date, May 19, 2022. The parties are directed to provide Chambers with two physical courtesy copies of their motion papers on the same date they are served on opposing counsel. The parties are further directed to provide the Court with an electronic courtesy copy of the motion papers as they are served per this Court's local emergency civil rules. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 11. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 3/4/2022) (mml)
March 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 5/19/2022. Responses due by 5/19/2022. Replies due by 5/19/2022. (mml)
March 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 LETTER MOTION for Conference Re: Motion to Dismiss addressed to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman from Dean N. Panos dated March 4, 2022. Document filed by Kellogg Sales Company..(Panos, Dean)
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Dean N. Panos to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 9. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 3/1/2022) (ate)
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #9 MOTION for Dean N. Panos to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Corrected). Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
February 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Dean N. Panos to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Corrected). Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kellogg Sales Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support, #2 Illinois Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Indiana Inactive Good Standing Letter, #4 Text of Proposed Order).(Panos, Dean)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #8 MOTION for Dean N. Panos to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25648886. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Indiana;. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. (bcu)
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Dean N. Panos to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25648886. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kellogg Sales Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support, #2 Illinois Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Indiana Inactive Good Standing Letter, #4 Text of Proposed Order).(Panos, Dean) Modified on 1/28/2022 (bcu).
January 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Alexander M. Smith to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 6. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 1/20/2022) (ate)
January 20, 2022 Opinion or Order >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #6 MOTION for Alexander M. Smith to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25608516. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (aea)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Alexander M. Smith to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25608516. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kellogg Sales Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support, #2 COGS, #3 Text of Proposed Order).(Smith, Alexander)
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Kellogg Sales Company waiver sent on 1/3/2022, answer due 3/4/2022. Document filed by Elizabeth Russett..(Sheehan, Spencer)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kellogg Sales Company..(gp)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (gp)
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Kellogg Sales Company, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Elizabeth Russett..(Sheehan, Spencer)
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Sheehan, Spencer)
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kellogg Sales Company. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25215998)Document filed by Elizabeth Russett..(Sheehan, Spencer)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Russett v. Kellogg Sales Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Russett
Represented By: Spencer Sheehan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kellogg Sales Company
Represented By: Dean N. Panos
Represented By: Alexander Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?