Akinleye v. The City of Peekskill et al
| Akintunde Akinleye |
| The City of Peekskill, P.O. Lawrence, John Doe, The State of New York and The County of Westchester |
| 7:2021cv10254 |
| December 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Philip M Halpern |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Lawrence, The City of Peekskill, The County of Westchester, The State of New York. (sha) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Akintunde Akinleye consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Akintunde Akinleye. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe, Lawrence, The City of Peekskill, The County of Westchester, The State of New York. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number 465407018788) Document filed by Akintunde Akinleye. (sac) |
| Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
