Suarez v. The Gap, Inc.
| Genevieve Suarez |
| The Gap, Inc. |
| 7:2022cv00021 |
| January 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Philip M Halpern |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #1 Complaint against The Gap, Inc. with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Genevieve Suarez. Related document: #1 Complaint..(Watkins, Christopher) |
Filing 12
ORDER: granting #11 Letter Motion for Leave to File Document. Application Granted. Plaintiff is Granted leave to file the First Amended Complaint in the form annexed (Doc. 11) by 3/14/2022. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 3/11/2022) (ama)
|
| Filing 11 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint addressed to Judge Philip M. Halpern from Christopher D. Watkins dated 03/11/2022. Document filed by Genevieve Suarez..(Watkins, Christopher) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 3/14/2022. (ama) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Christopher Dale Watkins. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Genevieve Suarez. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (sj) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #9 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Move or Otherwise Plead in Response to #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Philip M. Halpern from Nicole M. Zito dated February 28, 2022. Application granted. The time for defendant to answer or otherwise move with respect to the complaint is extended to 3/16/2022. SO ORDERED. (The Gap, Inc. answer due 3/16/2022.) (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 3/1/22) (yv)
|
| Filing 9 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Move or Otherwise Plead in Response to #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Philip M. Halpern from Nicole M. Zito dated February 28, 2022. Document filed by The Gap, Inc...(Zito, Nicole) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #7 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Move or Otherwise Plead in Response to #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Philip M. Halpern from Nicole M. Zito dated January 24, 2022. Application granted. The time for defendant to answer or otherwise move with respect to the complaint is extended to 3/2/2022. SO ORDERED. The Gap, Inc. answer due 3/2/2022 (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 1/25/2022) (jca)
|
| Filing 7 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Move or Otherwise Plead in Response to #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Philip M. Halpern from Nicole M. Zito dated January 24, 2022. Document filed by The Gap, Inc...(Zito, Nicole) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nicole M Zito on behalf of The Gap, Inc...(Zito, Nicole) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. The Gap, Inc. served on 1/10/2022, answer due 1/31/2022. Service was accepted by Paula Castro. Document filed by Genevieve Suarez..(Watkins, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to The Gap, Inc.. (sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Philip M. Halpern. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Watkins, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to The Gap, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Genevieve Suarez..(Watkins, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Gap, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25531554)Document filed by Genevieve Suarez..(Watkins, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Suarez v. The Gap, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Genevieve Suarez | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Dale Watkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Gap, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Nicole M Zito |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
