Celli v. Perez et al
Lucio Celli |
Daniel Perez, Benjamin Silverman, Randi Weingarten, Judge Cogan, Shannon Kopplin, Senate Ethic Committee, Senate Judiciary Commitee, Chief Judge Livingston and Sen. Schumer |
7:2022cv02353 |
March 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Cathy Seibel |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Schumer served on 3/29/2022, answer due 4/19/2022. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Lucio Celli. (ok) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Benjamin Silverman served on 3/29/2022, answer due 4/19/2022. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Lucio Celli. (ok) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Randi Weingarten served on 3/29/2022, answer due 4/19/2022. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Lucio Celli. (ok) |
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Senate Judiciary Commitee served on 3/29/2022, answer due 4/19/2022. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Lucio Celli. (ok) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Senate Ethic Committee served on 3/29/2021, answer due 4/19/2021. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Lucio Celli. (ok) |
Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Plaintiff's constitutional challenges to his conviction in the Eastern District of New York are dismissed without prejudice to his pursuing these claims on direct appeal from his conviction or in a collateral challenge to his conviction. The Clerk shall close the case. The Court warns Plaintiff that filing a new civil rights action in this court, challenging his Eastern District of New York conviction, will result in an order barring him from filing any new action challenging that conviction, without prior permission. See 28 U.S.C. 1651. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/29/2022) (ama) |
Filing 2 MOTION to have the US Marshals Serve my Petitions Upon Judges and AUSAS. Document filed by Lucio Celli..(rdz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cogan, Shannon Kopplin, Livingston, Daniel Perez, Schumer, Senate Ethic Committee, Senate Judiciary Commitee, Benjamin Silverman, Randi Weingarten. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number 465407018948)Document filed by Lucio Celli. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit).(rdz) |
Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Cogan, Shannon Kopplin, Livingston, Daniel Perez, Schumer, Senate Ethic Committee, Senate Judiciary Commitee, Benjamin Silverman, Randi Weingarten..(rdz) |
Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.