Telesco v. Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff: Kenneth Telesco
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Case Number: 7:2022cv02687
Filed: April 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Nelson Stephen Roman
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 dtp Diversity - Deceptive Trade Practices
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 31 OPINION & ORDER re: #25 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. filed by Starbucks Corporation. For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss with respect to Plaintiff's: (1) claim for breach of express warranty; (2) claim for violation of GBL 349; and (3) claim for violation of GBL 350. The Court dismisses these claims without prejudice. As Plaintiff's First Amended Class Action Complaint was the first Complaint for which motion practice occurred, Plaintiff is granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff will have until August 11, 2023 to do so, consistent with this order. Plaintiff is advised that the Second Amended Complaint will replace, not supplement, the First Amended Complaint, and so any claims they wish to pursue must be included in, or attached to, the Second Amended Complaint. Defendant is then directed to answer or otherwise respond by September 5, 2023. If Plaintiff fails to file a second Amended Complaint within the time allowed, those claims dismissed without prejudice by this order will be deemed dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 25. ( Amended Pleadings due by 8/11/2023.) (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 7/18/2023) (ate)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #25 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. . Document filed by Starbucks Corporation..(Giali, Dale)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss served on Defendant Starbucks Corporation on 11/03/2022. Document filed by Kenneth Telesco..(Klorczyk, Frederick)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #25 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. . Document filed by Kenneth Telesco..(Klorczyk, Frederick)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss, Memorandum of Law in Support, and Declaration of Dale J. Giali served on Plaintiff Kenneth Telesco on 09/19/2022. Document filed by Starbucks Corporation..(Giali, Dale)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #25 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. . Document filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Dale J. Giali, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4).(Giali, Dale)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. Document filed by Starbucks Corporation..(Giali, Dale)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting #23 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: The Court GRANTS the application. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the appearance of defense attorney Daniel D. Queen in this case and the motion on ECF No. 23. Attorney Daniel David Queen terminated. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 8/16/2022) (ate)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MOTION for Daniel D. Queen to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Starbucks Corporation..(Queen, Daniel)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #21 Letter filed by Starbucks Corporation. ENDORSEMENT: The Court waives the PMC requirement and grants Def. leave to file its motion under the following briefing schedule: Def.'s mov. papers are to be served (not filed) on Sept. 19, 2022; Pl.'s opp. papers are to be served (not filed) on Nov. 3, 2022; and Def.'s reply papers are to be served on Nov. 23, 2022. All motion papers are to be filed by the parties on the reply date, Nov. 23, 2022. The parties are directed to provide Chambers with two physical courtesy copies of their motion papers on the same date they are served on opposing counsel. The parties are further directed to provide the Court with an electronic courtesy copy of the motion papers as they are served per this Court's local emergency civil rules. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 8/5/2022) (ate) Modified on 8/5/2022 (ate).
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 LETTER addressed to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman from Keri Borders dated August 5, 2022 re: Pre-Motion. Document filed by Starbucks Corporation..(Borders, Keri)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 11/23/2022. (ate)
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Keri Elizabeth Borders on behalf of Starbucks Corporation. New Address: King & Spalding LLP, 633 W. Fifth Street, Suite 1600, Los Angeles, California, United States 90071, 2134434355..(Borders, Keri)
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Dale J. Giali on behalf of Starbucks Corporation. New Address: King & Spalding LLP, 633 W. Fifth Street, Suite 1600, Los Angeles, California, United States 90071, 2134434355..(Giali, Dale)
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #17 Letter filed by Starbucks Corporation. ENDORSEMENT: The Court GRANTS the application and extends the deadline for Defendant to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint to August 5, 2022. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 17. SO ORDERED. Starbucks Corporation answer due 8/5/2022. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 7/8/2022) (vfr)
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 LETTER addressed to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman from Daniel D. Queen dated July 7, 2022 re: extension of time to respond to the amended complaint to August 5, 2022. Document filed by Starbucks Corporation..(Queen, Daniel)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #1 Complaint against Starbucks Corporation with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Kenneth Telesco. Related document: #1 Complaint..(Klorczyk, Frederick)
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF KERI E. BORDERS granting #12 Motion for Keri E. Borders to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 12. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 5/23/2022) (ks)
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF DALE J. GIALI granting #13 Motion for Dale J. Giali to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 13. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 5/23/2022) (ks)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #13 MOTION for Dale J. Giali to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26173473. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (aea)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #12 MOTION for Keri E. Borders to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (aea)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MOTION for Dale J. Giali to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26173473. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Dale Giali, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order on Admission for Pro Hac Vice).(Giali, Dale)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION for Keri E. Borders to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Keri Borders, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order for Admission of Pro Hac Vice).(Borders, Keri)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #10 MOTION for Dale J. Giali to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26167055. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of CA;. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order. (vba) Modified on 5/19/2022 (vba).
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #11 MOTION for Dale J. Giali to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26167055. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of California (415-865-7000);. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. (aea)
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Dale J. Giali to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26167055. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Dale Giali, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice).(Giali, Dale) Modified on 5/19/2022 (aea).
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY MOTION for Keri E. Borders to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26159424. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Keri Borders, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice).(Borders, Keri) Modified on 5/19/2022 (vba).
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER terminating #8 Letter Motion for Conference re: #8 LETTER MOTION for Conference re Starbucks Proposed Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) addressed to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman from Daniel D. Queen dated May 16, 2022. The Court waives the pre-motion conference requirement and grants Defendant leave to file its motion pursuant to the following briefing schedule: (1) Defendant's moving papers are to be served (not filed) on June 15, 2022; (2) Plaintiff's opposition papers are to be served (not filed) on July 15, 2022; and (3) Defendant's reply papers are to be served on August 1, 2022. All motion papers are to be filed by the parties on the reply date, August 1, 2022. The parties are directed to provide Chambers with two physical courtesy copies of their motion papers on the same date they are served on opposing counsel. The parties are further directed to provide the Court with an electronic courtesy copy of the motion papers as they are served per this Court's local emergency civil rules. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 8. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 5/16/2022) (ate)
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 LETTER MOTION for Conference re Starbucks Proposed Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) addressed to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman from Daniel D. Queen dated May 16, 2022. Document filed by Starbucks Corporation..(Queen, Daniel)
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 8/1/2022. (ate)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #6 Letter filed by Starbucks Corporation. ENDORSEMENT: The Court GRANTS the application and extends Def.'s deadline to file a responsive pleading to Pl.'s Compl. to May 16, 2022. Starbucks Corporation answer due 5/16/2022. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 4/25/2022) (ate)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 LETTER addressed to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman from Daniel D. Queen dated April 25, 2022 re: extension of time to respond to complaint to May 16, 2022. Document filed by Starbucks Corporation..(Queen, Daniel)
April 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Starbucks Corporation served on 4/5/2022, answer due 4/26/2022. Service was accepted by Cynthia Jones, Employee of Registered Agent. Document filed by Kenneth Telesco..(Klorczyk, Frederick)
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (gp)
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Starbucks Corporation. (sj)
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Frederick John Klorczyk. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Kenneth Telesco. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (sj)
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj)
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj)
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Starbucks Corporation, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kenneth Telesco..(Klorczyk, Frederick)
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Klorczyk, Frederick)
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Starbucks Corporation. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25948125)Document filed by Kenneth Telesco..(Klorczyk, Frederick)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Telesco v. Starbucks Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Telesco
Represented By: Frederick John Klorczyk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: Dale J. Giali
Represented By: Daniel David Queen
Represented By: Keri Elizabeth Borders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?