Ricardo Vidaud et al v. PepsiCo, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Ricardo Vidaud and John Archibeque
Defendant: Pepsico Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Case Number: 7:2022cv04850
Filed: June 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Jed S Rakoff
Referring Judge: Nelson Stephen Roman
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (23 in 7:22-cv-04828-NSR, 19 in 7:22-cv-04216-NSR, 16 in 7:22-cv-05351-NSR, 52 in 7:22-cv-00802-NSR, 13 in 7:22-cv-05200-NSR, 17 in 7:22-cv-04784-NSR, 19 in 7:22-cv-04238-NSR, 22 in 7:22-cv-04212-NSR, 19 in 7:22-cv-05196-NSR, 28 in 7:22-cv-05198-NSR, 27 in 7:22-cv-04851-NSR, 29 in 7:22-cv-04850-NSR, 25 in 7:22-cv-04556-NSR, 21 in 7:22-cv-04555-NSR, 26 in 7:22-cv-02370-NSR) LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages addressed to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman from Seth R. Lesser dated July 12, 2022. filed by Emanuele Stevens. Lead case: Stevens v. PepsiCo Inc. et al, No. 7:22-cv-802 (NSR). Consolidated cases: Marshall v. PepsiCo, Inc. et al, No. 7:22-cv-2370 (NSR). Tschudy v. PepsiCo, Inc., No. 7:22-cv-4212 (NSR). Drobsch v. PepsiCo, Inc., No. 7:22-cv-4216 (NSR). Smith v. PepsiCo, Inc., No. 7:22-cv-4238 (NSR). Mitchell v. PepsiCo, Inc., No. 7:22-cv-4555 (NSR). Parrish v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc., No. 7:22-cv-4556 (NSR). Irving-Millentree v. PepsiCo, Inc., No. 7:22-cv-4784 (NSR). Winger v. The Quaker Oats Company, No. 7:22-cv-4828 (NSR). Vidaud et al v. PepsiCo, Inc. et al, No. 7:22-cv-4850 (NSR). Madriz et al v. PepsiCo, Inc. et al, No. 7:22-cv-4851 (NSR). Poulson v. PepsiCo, Inc. d/b/a PFS et al, No. 7:22-cv-5196 (NSR). White v. PepsiCo, Inc., No. 7:22-cv-5198 (NSR). Ellis et al v. PepsiCo, Inc., No. 7:22-cv-5200 (NSR). King v. PepsiCo Inc., No. 7:22-cv-5351 (NSR). The parties joint request for leave to file up to 40 pages in their motion for preliminary class action and collective action notice and preliminary approval in these consolidated actions is GRANTED. The Court notifies Plaintiffs counsel that they need not file a document in each of the consolidated cases. Counsel merely needs to file one document in the lead case, indicating that it is the lead case, and using all case captions and docket numbers where appropriate. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions as set forth in this order. Motions terminated: (22 in 7:22-cv-04212-NSR, 27 in 7:22-cv-04851-NSR, 25 in 7:22-cv-04556-NSR, 19 in 7:22-cv-04238-NSR, 13 in 7:22-cv-05200-NSR, 16 in 7:22-cv-05351-NSR, 17 in 7:22-cv-04784-NSR, 26 in 7:22-cv-02370-NSR, 28 in 7:22-cv-05198-NSR, 21 in 7:22-cv-04555-NSR, 19 in 7:22-cv-05196-NSR, 23 in 7:22-cv-04828-NSR, 19 in 7:22-cv-04216-NSR, 29 in 7:22-cv-04850-NSR) LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages addressed to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman from Seth R. Lesser dated July 12, 2022. filed by Emanuele Stevens. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 7/13/2022) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:22-cv-00802-NSR et al. (ate)
July 12, 2022 Filing 29 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages addressed to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman from Seth R. Lesser dated July 12, 2022. Document filed by Emanuele Stevens.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:22-cv-00802-NSR et al..(Lesser, Seth)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION granting (46) Motion to Consolidate Cases 22-CV-802 (as Lead Case) with 22-cv-5351 in case 7:22-cv-00802-NSR. Came on to be considered the Parties' Fourth Joint Motion to Consolidate Additional Cases, and having reviewed the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that it should be and hereby is GRANTED. The Parties have represented to the Court that they seek consolidation of the matters for the purpose of having a global settlement. It is therefore ORDERED that the following matters are consolidated in their entirety into this case: King v. PepsiCo., Inc., No. 7:22-cv-05351-UA. It is further ORDERED that this matter, Emanuele Stevens v. PepsiCo, Inc., No. 7:22-cv-00802-NSR, shall remain designated the lead for all consolidated matters. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 46. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 7/6/2022) (tg)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION granting (45) Motion to Consolidate Cases 22-CV-802 (as Lead Case) with 22-cv-5196, 22-cv-5198, 22-cv-5200 in case 7:22-cv-00802-NSR. Came on to be considered the Parties' Second Joint Motion to Consolidate Additional Cases, and having reviewed the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that it should be and hereby is GRANTED. The Parties have represented to the Court that they seek consolidation of the matters for the purpose of having a global settlement. It is therefore ORDERED that the following matters are consolidated in their entirety into this case: Poulson v. PepsiCo, Inc. et al., No. 1:22-cv-05196-NSR. White v. PepsiCo, Inc., No. 1:22-cv-05198-NSR. Ellis v. PepsiCo,.Inc., No. 7:22-cv-05200-UA. It is further ORDERED that this matter, Emanuele Stevens v. PepsiCo, Inc., No. 7:22-cv-00802-NSR, shall remain designated the lead for all consolidated matters. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 45. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 7/6/2022) (tg)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION granting (43) Motion to Consolidate Cases 22-CV-802 (as Lead Case) with 22-cv-4784, 22-cv-4828, 22-cv-4850, 22-cv-4851 in case 7:22-cv-00802-NSR. Came on to be considered the Parties' Second Joint Motion to Consolidate Additional Cases, and having reviewed the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that it should be and hereby is GRANTED. The Parties have represented to the Court that they seek consolidation of the matters for the purpose of having a global settlement. It is therefore ORDERED that the following matters are consolidated in their entirety into this case: Irving-Millentree v. PepsiCo,Inc., No. 1:22-cv-04784-RA. Wingerv. The Quaker Oats Company, No. 1:22-cv-04828-MKV-SLC. Vidaud v. PepsiCo, Inc. et al., No. 1:22-cv-04850-JSR. Madriz et al. v. PepsiCo., Inc. et al., No. 1:22-cv-04851-ALC. It is further ORDERED that this matter, Emanuele Stevens v. PepsiCo, Inc., No. 7:22-cv-00802-NSR, shall remain designated the lead for all consolidated matters. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 43. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 7/6/2022) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:22-cv-00802-NSR, 7:22-cv-04784-NSR, 7:22-cv-04828-NSR, 7:22-cv-04850-NSR, 7:22-cv-04851-NSR (tg)
July 6, 2022 CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 7:22-cv-00802-NSR. Notice of Assignment to follow. (vba)
July 6, 2022 Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vba)
July 6, 2022 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. Judge Jed S. Rakoff is no longer assigned to the case. (vba)
July 6, 2022 CONSOLIDATED MEMBER CASE: Create association to 7:22-cv-00802-NSR.. (tg)
June 13, 2022 Filing 25 NOTICE of Filing Consent. Document filed by Ricardo Vidaud. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent).(Parmet, Matthew)
June 9, 2022 Filing 24 NOTICE of Filing Consent. Document filed by Ricardo Vidaud. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent).(Parmet, Matthew)
June 9, 2022 Filing 23 NOTICE of Filing Motion for Consolidation in Related Case. Document filed by Ricardo Vidaud..(Parmet, Matthew)
June 9, 2022 Filing 22 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Matthew Scott Parmet on behalf of Ricardo Vidaud..(Parmet, Matthew)
June 9, 2022 Filing 21 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from the United States District Court - District of California Central; Case Number: 2:22-cv-02713. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket entries received.
June 9, 2022 Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (laq)
June 9, 2022 NOTE TO OUT OF STATE ATTORNEYS: Please visit the Court's website at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/ for information regarding admission to the S.D.N.Y. Bar and the CM/ECF Rules & Filing Instructions. (laq)
June 9, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (laq)
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Order Transferring Venue by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. The Court ORDERS this matter is transferred in its entirety to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Original file, certified copy of the transfer order and docket sheet sent. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
June 1, 2022 Filing 19 Joint STIPULATION to Transfer Case to Southern District of New York filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Vidaud. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Parmet, Matthew) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
June 1, 2022 Filing 18 NOTICE of Filing Consent filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Vidaud. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent, #2 Exhibit 2 - Consent)(Parmet, Matthew) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
May 26, 2022 Filing 17 NOTICE of Filing Consent filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Vidaud. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent, #2 Exhibit 2 - Consent)(Parmet, Matthew) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 5:22-cv-00549 JGB(KKx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson and Judge Otis D. Wright, II to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-02713 JGB(KKx). Signed by Judge Jesus G. Bernal (rn) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
May 18, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE Filing Consent filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Vidaud. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent, #2 Exhibit 2 - Consent)(Parmet, Matthew) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
May 17, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE Filing Consent filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Vidaud. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent, #2 Exhibit 2 - Consent)(Parmet, Matthew) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
May 16, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE Filing Consent filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Vidaud. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent, #2 Exhibit 2 - Consent, #3 Exhibit 3 - Consent, #4 Exhibit 4 - Consent, #5 Exhibit 5 - Consent, #6 Exhibit 6 - Consent, #7 Exhibit 7 - Consent, #8 Exhibit 8 - Consent, #9 Exhibit 9 - Consent, #10 Exhibit 10 - Consent, #11 Exhibit 11 - Consent, #12 Exhibit 12 - Consent, #13 Exhibit 13 - Consent, #14 Exhibit 14 - Consent, #15 Exhibit 15 - Consent, #16 Exhibit 16 - Consent)(Parmet, Matthew) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
May 9, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE Filing Consent filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Vidaud. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent, #2 Exhibit 2 - Consent, #3 Exhibit 3 - Consent, #4 Exhibit 4 - Consent)(Parmet, Matthew) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
April 29, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Vidaud. of Filing Consent (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent, #2 Exhibit 2 - Consent)(Parmet, Matthew) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
April 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
April 25, 2022 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Vidaud. upon PepsiCo, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/22/2022, answer due 6/21/2022. Waiver of Service signed by Linda H. Joseph. (Parmet, Matthew) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
April 25, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
April 25, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
April 25, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (ghap) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
April 22, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Consent filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Vidaud. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent, #2 Exhibit 2 - Consent)(Parmet, Matthew) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
April 22, 2022 Filing 3 Notice and CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Vidaud, (Parmet, Matthew) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
April 22, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Vidaud. (Parmet, Matthew) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]
April 22, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33179325 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Vidaud. (Attorney Matthew Scott Parmet added to party Ricardo Vidaud(pty:pla))(Parmet, Matthew) [Transferred from California Central on 6/9/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ricardo Vidaud et al v. PepsiCo, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ricardo Vidaud
Represented By: Matthew Scott Parmet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Archibeque
Represented By: Matthew Scott Parmet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pepsico Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?